{"id":205525,"date":"2024-09-12T16:30:57","date_gmt":"2024-09-12T14:30:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.hwcooling.net\/?p=205525\/"},"modified":"2024-09-13T16:25:49","modified_gmt":"2024-09-13T14:25:49","slug":"amd-ryzen-9-9900x-in-a-megatest-of-40-cpus-review","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.hwcooling.net\/en\/amd-ryzen-9-9900x-in-a-megatest-of-40-cpus-review\/","title":{"rendered":"AMD Ryzen 9 9900X in a megatest of 40 CPUs"},"content":{"rendered":"

We’re wrapping up tests of the new Ryzen 9000 desktop CPUs. This with a model that once increased the number of cores compared to its predecessor, or a pilot model (Ryzen 9 3900X<\/a>) from eight to twelve on AMD’s mainstream platform. Even compared to the Ryzen 9 5900X<\/a>, the new Ryzen 9 9900X is more than twice as fast in some practical situations. This model is also the best when it comes to efficiency.<\/p>\n

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X in detail<\/h2>\n

The fourth Ryzen with 12 cores for mainstream platforms is built on the AMD Zen 5 architecture<\/a>. While the first two models (R9 3900X<\/a> and R9 5900X<\/a>) still supported the AMD AM4 platform (and DDR4 memory), the Ryzen 9 9900X, like the older Ryzen 9 7900X<\/a>, comes with support for the AMD AM5 platform and DDR5 memory.<\/p>\n

The intergenerational difference is mainly in the architecture used (Zen 5<\/a> vs. Zen 4<\/a>), while the basic structure of the processor remains unchanged. One of the three chiplets is even the same \u2013 the I\/O chip is manufactured the same way (N5P) \u2013 what’s different (N4P) are the chiplets with the processor cores. In addition to the new architecture (Zen 5<\/a>), there is a higher density of transistor integration (than in Zen 4<\/a>) on a comparable area (approx. 71 mm\u00b2\/chiplet). Cooling is to be improved, as indicated by the reported temperatures from the diagnostic tools. This should be due to the restructuring of the elements of the core with a view to reducing the concentration of high temperatures in one place. More details on this can be found in the subsection of our Ryzen 5 9600X test<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Of course, we don’t know if the situation with the reduced temperatures is as optimistic as the internal sensors report. In any case, the processor’s internal management works with these lower values and as a result, higher clock speeds of, for example, single-core boost are achieved. Its amount strictly depends on the temperature.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

The processor cores are spread between two chiplets (CCD), symmetrically (6+6 cores). The claimed baseline clock speed of the all-core boost is 300 MHz lower for the Ryzen 9 9900X compared to the Ryzen 9 7900X<\/a>. This is because of both lower TDP and PPT, which means the power limit should kick in sooner. The PPT of the Ryzen 9 9900X is the same as that of the Ryzen 9 7900X TDP \u2013 170W. And the PPT, as you know, is 1.35 times the TDP. That’s roughly the ratio by which the Ryzen 9 9900X could\/should be more power efficient. The overall power consumption also depends on the nature of the power management of the motherboard itself or the (in)efficiency of its VRM.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

The list price of the Ryzen 9 9900X is lower by 50 USD (AMD’s suggested 499 USD) than it was for the Ryzen 9 7900X, but the newer model is naturally more expensive in stores. The discontinued Ryzen 9 7900X is often significantly cheaper, sometimes the difference in the final price is up to around 150 EUR.<\/p>\n

Please note:<\/strong> The article continues in the following chapters.<\/p>\n

<\/div>
<\/th><\/th><\/th><\/th><\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
Manufacturer <\/td><\/td>AMD <\/td>AMD <\/td>Intel <\/td><\/tr>
Line <\/td><\/td>Ryzen 9 <\/td>Ryzen 9 <\/td>Core i7 <\/td><\/tr>
SKU <\/td><\/td>9900X <\/td>7900X <\/td>14700K <\/td><\/tr>
Codename <\/td><\/td>Granite Ridge <\/td>Raphael <\/td>Raptor Lake Refresh <\/td><\/tr>
CPU microarchitecture <\/td><\/td>Zen 5 <\/td>Zen 4 <\/td>Golden Cove (P) + Gracemont (E) <\/td><\/tr>
Manufacturing node <\/td><\/td>4 nm + 6 nm <\/td>5 nm + 6 nm <\/td>7 nm (\u201eIntel 7 Ultra\u201c) <\/td><\/tr>
Socket <\/td><\/td>AM5 <\/td>AM5 <\/td>LGA 1700 <\/td><\/tr>
Launch date <\/td><\/td>08\/15\/2024 <\/td>09\/26\/2022 <\/td>10\/17\/2023 <\/td><\/tr>
Launch price <\/td><\/td>499 USD <\/td>549 USD <\/td>409 USD <\/td><\/tr>
Core count <\/td><\/td>12 <\/td>12 <\/td>8+12 <\/td><\/tr>
Thread count <\/td><\/td>24 <\/td>24 <\/td>28 <\/td><\/tr>
Base frequency <\/td><\/td>4.4 GHz <\/td>4.7 GHz <\/td>3.4 GHz (P)\/2.5 GHz (E) <\/td><\/tr>
Max. Boost (1 core) <\/td><\/td>5.6 GHz (5.62 GHz unofficially) <\/td>5.6 GHz (5.75 GHz unofficially) <\/td>5.6 GHz (P)\/4.3 GHz (E) <\/td><\/tr>
Max. boost (all-core) <\/td><\/td>N\/A <\/td>N\/A <\/td>5.5 GHz (P)\/4.3 GHz (E) <\/td><\/tr>
Typ boostu <\/td><\/td>PB 2.0 <\/td>PB 2.0 <\/td>TBM 3.0 <\/td><\/tr>
L1i cache <\/td><\/td>32 kB\/core <\/td>32 kB\/core <\/td>32 kB\/core (P), 64 kB\/core (E) <\/td><\/tr>
L1d cache <\/td><\/td>48 kB\/core <\/td>32 kB\/core <\/td>48 kB\/core (P), 32 kB\/core (E) <\/td><\/tr>
L2 cache <\/td><\/td>1 MB\/core <\/td>1 MB\/core <\/td>2 MB\/core (P), 3\u00d7 4 MB\/4 cores (E) <\/td><\/tr>
L3 cache <\/td><\/td>2\u00d7 32 MB <\/td>2\u00d7 32 MB <\/td>1\u00d7 33 MB <\/td><\/tr>
TDP <\/td><\/td>120 W <\/td>170 W <\/td>125 W <\/td><\/tr>
Max. power draw during boost <\/td><\/td>170 W (PPT) <\/td>230 W (PPT) <\/td>253 W (PL2) <\/td><\/tr>
Overclocking support <\/td><\/td>Yes <\/td>Yes <\/td>Yes <\/td><\/tr>
Memory (RAM) support <\/td><\/td>DDR5-5600 <\/td>DDR5-5200 <\/td>DDR5-5600\/DDR4-3200 <\/td><\/tr>
Memory channel count <\/td><\/td>2\u00d7 64 bit <\/td>2\u00d7 64 bit <\/td>2\u00d7 64 bit <\/td><\/tr>
RAM bandwidth <\/td><\/td>89.6 GB\/s <\/td>83.2 GB\/s <\/td>89.6 GB\/s\/51.2 GB\/s <\/td><\/tr>
ECC RAM support <\/td><\/td>Yes (depends on motherboard support) <\/td>Yes (depends on motherboard support) <\/td>Yes (with vPro\/W680) <\/td><\/tr>
PCI Express support <\/td><\/td>5.0 <\/td>5.0 <\/td>5.0\/4.0 <\/td><\/tr>
PCI Express lanes <\/td><\/td>\u00d716 + \u00d74 + \u00d74 <\/td>\u00d716 + \u00d74 + \u00d74 <\/td>\u00d716 (5.0) + \u00d74 (4.0) <\/td><\/tr>
Chipset downlink <\/td><\/td>PCIe 4.0 \u00d74 <\/td>PCIe 4.0 \u00d74 <\/td>DMI 4.0 \u00d78 <\/td><\/tr>
Chipset downlink bandwidth <\/td><\/td>8.0 GB\/s duplex <\/td>8.0 GB\/s duplex <\/td>16.0 GB\/s duplex <\/td><\/tr>
BCLK <\/td><\/td>100 MHz <\/td>100 MHz <\/td>100 MHz <\/td><\/tr>
Die size <\/td><\/td>2\u00d7 70.6 mm\u00b2 + 118 mm\u00b2 <\/td>2\u00d7 71 mm\u00b2 + 118 mm\u00b2 <\/td>~257 mm\u00b2 <\/td><\/tr>
Transistor count <\/td><\/td>8,16 + 3,37 mld. <\/td>2\u00d7 6,57 + 3,37 bn. <\/td>? mld. <\/td><\/tr>
TIM used under IHS <\/td><\/td>Solder <\/td>Solder <\/td>Solder <\/td><\/tr>
Boxed cooler in package <\/td><\/td>No <\/td>No <\/td>No <\/td><\/tr>
Instruction set extensions <\/td><\/td>SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA, SHA, VAES (256-bit), AVX-512, VNNI <\/td>SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA, SHA, VAES (256-bit), AVX-512, VNNI <\/td>SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA, SHA, VNNI (256-bit), GNA 3.0, VAES (256-bit), vPro <\/td><\/tr>
Virtualization <\/td><\/td>AMD-V, IOMMU, NPT <\/td>AMD-V, IOMMU, NPT <\/td>VT-x, VT-d, EPT <\/td><\/tr>
Integrated GPU <\/td><\/td>AMD Radeon <\/td>AMD Radeon <\/td>UHD 770 <\/td><\/tr>
GPU architecture <\/td><\/td>RDNA 2 <\/td>RDNA 2 <\/td>Xe LP (Gen. 12) <\/td><\/tr>
GPU: shader count <\/td><\/td>128 <\/td>128 <\/td>256 <\/td><\/tr>
GPU: TMU count <\/td><\/td>8 <\/td>8 <\/td>16 <\/td><\/tr>
GPU: ROP count <\/td><\/td>4 <\/td>4 <\/td>8 <\/td><\/tr>
GPU frequency <\/td><\/td>400\u20132200 MHz <\/td>400\u20132200 MHz <\/td>300\u20131600 MHz <\/td><\/tr>
Display outputs <\/td><\/td>DP 2.0, HDMI 2.1 <\/td>DP 2.0, HDMI 2.1 <\/td>DP 1.4a, HDMI 2.1 <\/td><\/tr>
Max. resolution <\/td><\/td>3840 \u00d7 2160 px (60 Hz)? * <\/td>3840 \u00d7 2160 px (60 Hz) <\/td>7680 \u00d7 4320 (60 Hz) <\/td><\/tr>
HW video encode <\/td><\/td>HEVC, VP9 <\/td>HEVC, VP9 <\/td>HEVC, VP9 <\/td><\/tr>
HW video decode <\/td><\/td>AV1, HEVC, VP9 <\/td>AV1, HEVC, VP9 <\/td>AV1, HEVC, VP9 <\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/div>Wordpress Table Plugin<\/a>\n
* We have no certainty on this parameter. AMD does not specify the maximum resolution and maximum refresh rate in publicly available materials. However, it is possible that it will be the same as for Ryzen 7000, i.e. 3840 \u00d7 2160 px (60 Hz).<\/strong><\/h6>\n