MS Flight Simulator July update test: More than twice the FPS

… no more limits

The announced update to increase performance in MFS is out, and we have a “before” and “after” comparison for you. Developers has worked to ensure that the processor does not significantly bottleneck the GPU. So far, the performance of the graphics card did not matter much, because only a fraction of its potential was used. But newly, you will achieve better performance on low-end hardware than you did before on a top-end rig.

It’s fascinating how badly Flight Simulator was optimized so far. In some cases, the framerate is more than doubled. The minimum fps increased very significantly, the higher the resolution, the more increase. In UHD resolution in the setup with the Ryzen 7 3700X processor from annoying 17.5 fps it went to pretty decent 40.5 fps. Using a weaker graphics card than the RTX 3080, this difference would be smaller but equally larger with GeForce RTX 3090 or Radeon RX 6900 XT and the like.

The increases in average fps are also extremely high. From the point of view of the graphics performance test, i.e. in the setup with the same processor (R9 5900X), we recorded up to 89% improvement with the RTX 3070, from 38.5 to 72.6 fps. Microstuttering has also been significantly reduced, while fps stability has increased, especially in UHD resolution, where the CPU impact is minimal. Detailed results of all measurements can be found in the graphs of the previous chapters (note for those readers who jump from the first chapter directly to the final one).

This is a completely different gaming experience. The increase in performance may be slightly higher than 60% they presented last month in a demonstration video. However, these results correspond to a relatively weaker configuration (with the Core i7-9700K and RTX 2060 Super). Now the total performance gain is significantly dependent on the performance of the graphics card, which the processor does not slow down at all, or just slightly if it does.

It sounds funny, but monitors with higher refresh rates now make sense for MFS. We’ll see which graphics card first breaks the 100 fps limit. However, this improvement also means that we will have to discard all the measured results in this game in the tests of graphics cards and processors and recalculate the average performances (without MFS), but that’s not a problem. At least there is a good opportunity to deploy that more objective methodology in which every game has the same weight, which we wanted to do a long time ago. But we’ll need some time … and play with Spitfire a little bit first.


  •  
  •  
  •  
Flattr this!

Welcome, Adam! 18 years of experience in graphics card testing

Join us in welcoming Adam Vágner on board HWC today. Of the authors I know, he’s the most experienced with graphics cards. That’s what he’ll be covering. Thus, graphics card testing will be taken over by a tester who’s been doing it for a long time (and intensively). This is the approach we pride ourselves on and will continue to do so. There are plenty of “experts in everything”, but true specialists are slowly disappearing from the map. Read more “Welcome, Adam! 18 years of experience in graphics card testing” »

  •  
  •  
  •  

“All” graphics cards in in-depth coil whine analysis

The number of graphics cards tested over the recent period has reached a number after which we can pause a bit and specifically focus on the noise level of their coils. The latter has always been recorded in standard measurements, but in large tests with lots of other information, this unique data was getting lost. That is why it will now, within the scope of this article, be limited to these only. So which of the modern graphics cards has the quieter coils? Read more ““All” graphics cards in in-depth coil whine analysis” »

  •  
  •  
  •  

Gigabyte RX 7900 GRE Gaming OC 16G in test of 30 graphics cards

The most “lightweight” AMD Navi 31 (XL) GPU, the slowest memory subsystem, but also the lowest price. That’s the RX 7900 GRE compared to the RX 7900 XT. This Radeon is also noticeably cheaper compared to the RTX 4070 Super, although the GeForce’s power efficiency is more favorable. The gaming performance of the RX 7900 GRE (RTX 4070S), meanwhile, is comparable. That is, as long as you won’t miss ray-tracing graphics. Read more “Gigabyte RX 7900 GRE Gaming OC 16G in test of 30 graphics cards” »

  •  
  •  
  •  

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *