To provide the best experiences, we and our partners use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us and our partners to process personal data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site and show (non-) personalized ads. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Click below to consent to the above or make granular choices. Your choices will be applied to this site only. You can change your settings at any time, including withdrawing your consent, by using the toggles on the Cookie Policy, or by clicking on the manage consent button at the bottom of the screen.
Technické uloženie alebo prístup sú nevyhnutne potrebné na legitímny účel umožnenia použitia konkrétnej služby, ktorú si účastník alebo používateľ výslovne vyžiadal, alebo na jediný účel vykonania prenosu komunikácie cez elektronickú komunikačnú sieť.
Technické uloženie alebo prístup je potrebný na legitímny účel ukladania preferencií, ktoré si účastník alebo používateľ nepožaduje.
Technické úložisko alebo prístup, ktorý sa používa výlučne na štatistické účely.
Technické úložisko alebo prístup, ktorý sa používa výlučne na anonymné štatistické účely. Bez predvolania, dobrovoľného plnenia zo strany vášho poskytovateľa internetových služieb alebo dodatočných záznamov od tretej strany, informácie uložené alebo získané len na tento účel sa zvyčajne nedajú použiť na vašu identifikáciu.
Technické úložisko alebo prístup sú potrebné na vytvorenie používateľských profilov na odosielanie reklamy alebo sledovanie používateľa na webovej stránke alebo na viacerých webových stránkach na podobné marketingové účely.
I think this article would benefit greatly from having frequency analysis, so for example it can be seen how the tonal peaks are broken up.
I know, you’re right. But the data for this article was generated long before Pavel started (just recently with DeepCool Assassin IV) to do frequency analysis of sound. The original aim of the tests of different heatsinks with different fans was simply not such that this article is going to be written about them. But we will certainly come back to it sometime, even with spectrograms.
Very interesting results. Seems like the Fluctus 120 outperforms the P12 and the Noctua NF-A12x25, regardless of which heatsink its tested with? I’m getting the Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120, I wonder if replacing the stock fans with the Fluctus will also make it better (i already have them from Fera 5 Dual). Too bad you didn’t test the Fluctus with the AK620 heatsink at least.
I’ve also looked at other fan reviews on this site, and they seem to have the Noctua NF-A12x25 and the Arctic P12 beating the Fluctus 120, so I’m confused why it did so well here.
What is the specific issue for you with regard to what I noted in the other comment, namely that it is not true that all heatsinks with a Fluctus 120 PWM fan achieve a higher cooling performance than with an NF-A12x25 fan at the same noise level? The results of Fluctus 120 PWM and NF-A12x25 are also very close to each other in the fan tests, if you look at the values of the airflow through the radiators (1, 2), which is the most similar (but still not equal) situation. And if you take into account the x variables that are extra in the in vivo tests (compared to in vitro), I think there is a very nice scaling of the results. In addition, my colleague Pavel measures the noise in a slightly different way than in the fan tests.
It’s not always true. The NH-U12A’s heatsink in some modes normalized by the same noise level achieves higher cooling performance with stock fans (NF-A12x25 PWM) than with Fluctus 120 PWM. Both with two and one fan. Note also the positions with missing values, such as in the “39dBA@210 W” mode, which, as mentioned in the note, means that the configuration (heatsink + fan) does not pass the specified load. In this case due to insufficient cooling performance.