Test of 27 thermal compounds, part 2

The list of thermal compounds + test procedures

The second round will be especially interesting for people who want to find the best solution for a standard use. The winner is a big surprise. Gelid, Noctua, Phobya, Reeven, SilentiumPC, Thermal Grizzly or Zalman? We can give away that it is not an expected favourite this time. We enjoyed a nice competition in the middle category, where it takes a lot to keep making a difference. We also tested OEM paste from Scythe as a bonus.

The list of thermal compounds + test procedures

The alphabetical order of tested samples will be familiar to you from the previous part. It will be easy for you to find a particular paste in every picture and in the sampler. The sheet contains 13 entries again. Therefore, the 14th drop on the desk, Scythe compound, can be a bit confusing because you cannot buy it separately. It only comes with the Scythe coolers.


Most of the pastes in the second test have higher viscosity. The highest is proven for Thermal Grizzly Hydronaut which does not contain any silicone, and roughly 190 Pa·s in a cold state figures. On the other hand, the relatively thin Gelid GC-Pro will have less than the specified 170 Pa·s.

The illustration of viscosity. Samples are in the alphabetical order from left to right

We managed to spread every paste evenly, but some were a challenge. However, not Zalman ZM-STG2, which used to be known for its “chewing gum“ consistency and tearing, probably due to inappropriate storage and drying silicone. This time it behaved like a different paste (tested on five samples). Noctua NT-H1 and SilentiumPC Pactum PT-1 are also excellently prepared for smooth spreading. Quite elastic NanoGrease Extreme is a bigger problem, especially HeGrease Extreme which sticks more to the applicator than to the heatspreader. In this case, it is more practical to use the drop method.

    

The heating element was overclocked Intel Core i7-5930K@4.4 GHz (on Gigabyte X99 UD4) with increased Vcore to 1.25 V. We simulated the burn in InterBurnTest (7500 MB). The waste heat was around 225 W. After the initial burn in, the tests took 300 seconds. We used high-flow industrial fans Noctua iPPC NF-F12 2000 and Scythe Fuma cooler, so five minutes should be more than enough for temperatures to stabilize. Temperatures can decrease a bit after several hours, which was the case of Arctic Silver 5, but it is a rare situation because most of compounds do not require a long-term burn in to provide the best results.

We used a smooth layer of 0.1 ml of paste for every application. We repeated every test twice (new installation included) to make sure that measured values match. The intake air temperature was 21 – 21.3 °C, ensured in our air-conditioned lab.

   

 

  •  
  •  
  •  
Flattr this!

Stiffer and more efficient, improvements of the Arctic P12 (Max)

Arctic has released a successor to the P12 fan, or perhaps more likely a higher-end model of it, as the P12 Max is a bit more expensive. That’s because it has a significantly more sophisticated design that addresses the shortcomings of the P12. In particular, the P12 Max has stiffened blades to counteract the high vibration of Arctic’s 5-blade rotors, and also, it will be one of the most powerful 120mm fans due to its significantly increased speed. Read more “Stiffer and more efficient, improvements of the Arctic P12 (Max)” »

  •  
  •  
  •  

The lowered Alpine 17 (LP) CPU cooler is 43 mm tall

Arctic now has a smaller version of the Alpine 17. The model of this top-flow cooler with the LP (low profile) end tag is one fan lower. This opens doors side panels to tighter cases where taller designs won’t fit, and Intel Laminar RM1 (from Core i3/5/7 packages) or RS1 (from Celerons and Pentiums) coolers tend to be too tall as well. However, it’s important to keep in mind that the Arctic Alpine 17 LP cooler is designed for very low-power processors. Read more “The lowered Alpine 17 (LP) CPU cooler is 43 mm tall” »

  •  
  •  
  •  

Arctic MX-6 thermal paste is out, a quick replacement for the MX-5

Arctic is renumbering the MX thermal pastes (from 5 to 6) faster than ever before. The MX-5 arrived just last year, but earlier this year there was a report that some batches were drying up prematurely. As a result of such a shortcoming, customer confidence in these thermal pastes may have been so lowered that a new model is the best route to take from a business perspective. And here it is, unfortunately again without the basic parameters. Read more “Arctic MX-6 thermal paste is out, a quick replacement for the MX-5” »

  •  
  •  
  •  

Comments (11) Add comment

    1. Hello, we will try to find out in the next test of compounds. If there are any other pastes that you are interested in, please, let us know and we will include them too. And thanks for this tip!

  1. So do you recommend using mastergel (regular non pro/maker version) since it came with my liquid cooler. But from what I seen in your benchmark both Arctic Silver 5 and MX4 (i have both and what I usually used ) performed better than mastergel.

  2. How can the ” Phobya HeGrease Extreme ” beat the ” Phobya NanoGrease Extreme “? It has 10 W/mk. That’s weird af imo.

  3. Great experiment! How would Thermalright TF8 @ 13.8 W/m-K, and Thermalright TFX @ 14.3 W/m-K stack-up against this list?

  4. Good tests. Till now, I used mx2 cuz costwise it is hard to beat and if you test coolers or cpus, it is great for its money. But now preparing for Vega TIM change and things are little more confusing, as some of the best TIMs seems to struggle with this task. Seems that transfered heat might be kinda even bigger and on really small area. Also some pastes are better when used on watter cooling, so tems are quite low. When it goes high, hotspot on Vega for example, they lose their great effectivity. That is probabbly why some guys haf issue with Kryonaut in this case and had great results with GC extreme. I myself wanna buy Gelids extreme pads too and still thinking if also their paste or should try the best GelMaker from CM, as it seems wreck competitors too.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *