Big test of 120 mm fans. We known everything about eight of them

Fan details

To write that we have something mapped out to the last detail is perhaps too bold, but after proper preparation, few pieces of hardware are as easy to evaluate as fans. Of course, this had to be preceded by long preparations, developing a methodology, but you already know the story. What you don’t know yet is the first fruit, or rather the results of Akasa, SilentiumPC, SilverStone, Xigmatek or more exotic Reeven fans.

Regular readers of HWCooling know the environment in which we test fans. Whether from the articles dedicated to the methodology (here is something about the prototype, and here to the final version) or from dust filter tests.

For new visitors, it should be noted that all tests take place in a wind tunnel. We have built it ourselves according to the specific requirements for correct fan tests. However, there are bound to be voices about the “unnatural” environment and about how fan tests inside computers have more meaning. They certainly don’t.

Sure, it’s important to test fans with real obstacles, but it’s better to have airflow and pressure differences as the output than CPU temperature differences. These are lower or higher exactly because a particular fan has a lower or higher airflow or pressure. These key variables for fans are naturally affected by obstacles such as dust filters, grilles or cooler radiators. All of these are used in the tests.

With or without obstacles, we test the fans at different fixed noise levels. They are set in such a way that both users seeking noiseless operation and those who are primarily concerned with performance regardless of noise level will find their results. And since the same dBA levels can sound different, these measurements are supplemented by frequency characteristics of the sound. These show which frequencies are more pronounced and which, on the other hand, are weak. So much for a brief introduction to the testing. For those who have not yet read the detailed discussion of the test methodology, we recommend taking a look at it, chapters 2 to 11.

Fans for reference

All tested models have a 120 mm format and a thickness of 25 mm, so nothing non-standard. An overview of the basic parameters can be found in the table below. Below that are some photos – front and rear panel plus blade details.

Half of the fans use some form of RGB LED lighting, but since these are outgoing models, at best their connection is either 12-volt (Akasa Vegas X7 and SilentiumPC Sigma Pro Corona RGB), via 4-pins, which is no longer used today, or even shared. This means that the lighting shares a common power supply with the motor, and the effect of speed has an impact on brightness intensity. This is the case with Reeven Kiran fans or the really old Xigmatek XLF-F1256. For this first test, we deliberately chose discontinued and rather “ordinary” models. This was to get benchmark results for evaluating more attractive fans.

The favoured for the best results should be the Reeven Kiran and the SilverStone SST-FQ121. Reeven has the highest reported static pressure (2,95 mm H2O) and SilverStone the best airflow (114,68 m3/h).

* When reading performance values, a certain amount of tolerance must always be taken into account. For maximum speeds, ±10% is usually quoted, minimum speeds can vary considerably more from piece to piece, sometimes manufacturers will overlap by as much as ±50%. This must then also be adequately taken into account for air flow, static pressure and noise levels. If only one value is given in a table entry, this means that it always refers to the situation at maximum speed, which is achieved at 12 V or 100% PWM intensity. The manufacturer does not disclose the lower limit of the performance specifications in its materials in that case. The price in the last column is always approximate.

Akasa Vegas X7


Reeven Coldwing 12


Reeven Kiran


SilentiumPC Sigma Pro 120 PWM


SilentiumPC Sigma Pro Corona RGB 120


SilverStone SST-AP121


SilverStone SST-FQ121


Xigmatek XLF-F1256

The article continues with further chapters.

Flattr this!

Akasa AK-CC6606BP01: A stronger alternative to the Laminar RM1

The database of results of inexpensive low-profile CPU coolers is slowly growing. We tested the largest of the top-flow models from Akasa on the Intel LGA 1700 platform.Given the claimed TDP of 125 W, it looks like this might not only be a replacement for the Laminar RM1 and RS1 that come with more economical processors, but also a solution for open multiplier models that don’t come with a cooler. Read more “Akasa AK-CC6606BP01: A stronger alternative to the Laminar RM1” »


Akasa OTTO SF12: Anti-vibration membrane, wavy blades and IP68

Predisposed to more demanding industrial conditions, Akasa OTTO fans go well beyond “normal” home computer use. Complete water and dust resistance, three-phase torque and, above all, a unique vibration elimination system. The effectiveness of the proven “S-Flow” rotor is high, but there is one thing Akasa has overdone a bit. That is, if the OTTO SF12 fan is really meant for system cooling. Read more “Akasa OTTO SF12: Anti-vibration membrane, wavy blades and IP68” »


Akasa 77 W cooler (AK-CC6603EP01) test for Intel LGA 1700

Akasa has been working for a long time on small and simple coolers to serve as a low-cost replacement for bundled solutions. This company was among the first to come out with support for Intel LGA 1700 and even with more options. In this test, we’ll be checking out the AK-CC6603EP01 mid-range model, which takes on not only the competing Arctic Alpine CO, but also both Intel Laminar coolers (RM1 and RS1). Read more “Akasa 77 W cooler (AK-CC6603EP01) test for Intel LGA 1700” »


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *