Low price, high thermal conductivity – SPC Pactum PT-4

Thermal paste Pactum PT-4 released. SilentiumPC claims significantly higher thermal conductivity

A new thermal paste has been introduced – Pactum PT-4. Its specifications are admirable, considering the lower price range. The thermal conductivity is more than double that of the previous Pactum PT-2. At least on paper. It could finally be a real competition for the Arctic MX-5. Particularly the application of the PT-4 should be comfortable for its low viscosity.

SilentiumPC has a relatively strong position in the market among cheaper CPU coolers. Namely the Fera 3 is one of the best-selling coolers in our region, if not the very best-selling.

It is probably a little worse with pastes and Arctic MX resonates in stores a little more. This is despite the fact that SilentiumPC Pactum PT-2 is performs the same as Arctic MX-4 in HWCooling comparative tests. However, a comparison of the latest pastes of the two companies could already turn out differently. SilentiumPC Pactum PT-4 has a stated thermal conductivity of up to 12 W/mK (older PT-2 with only 5 W/mK).

We can only guess what the specifications of the Arctic MX-5 are. Its manufacturer does not mention thermal conductivity and has stopped specifying it in older models. This could mean that the intergenerational improvement is relatively small and Arctic does not want to point to it. Arctic would likely like to point this out if the MX-5 had a significantly higher thermal conductivity than the MX-4 or the even more popular MX-2. Similar to what SilentiumPC has now done.

Of course, one thing is the paper specs and the reality may differ. We will not find out just yet, but maybe later this year we will have a proper methodology for measuring thermal conductivity and other properties of thermal pastes. So keep your fingers crossed for us so that we’ll manage to come with a unique methodology for testing thermal pastes after our new fan testing methodology (first tests soon!). Now let’s get back to the Pactum PT-2.

The composition of Pactum PT-4 is based on zinc and aluminum compounds. However, despite the admixture of metals, it is not electrically conductive. SilentiumPC also speaks of low viscosity, which means that even under lower cooler pressure, a thin film is formed and the paste is generally better distributed on the contact surface.

The recommended application technique is as we would recommend, The recommended application technique is as we would recommend, a small drop or a dash to the center of the chip/IHS. For GPUs or CPU cores, which usually have a rectangular shape, the dash will be more suitable, and a drop for the processor IHS. The specified density of Pactum PT-4 paste is 2.6 g/cm3.

In order to achieve optimal properties, this paste does not require a longer time to “break in” and should give excellent results immediately. SPC Pactum PT-4 comes in two package sizes. A small 1.5 g (it will hopefully be included with processor coolers, the PT-2 is currently still packed with the latest Fera 5) and a larger 4 g pack. This should be enough for 6–13 applications, depending on the size of the area where the paste is applied.

For each case, a small spatula is also supplied with the paste. This is typically for more complicated applications, such as with Threadripper, although when squeezing out the paste in a cross you should do without it.

The paste is slowly beginning to appear in the offer various shops. So we believe that its wide availability and delivery to warehouses will only be a matter of a few days. The final price is very pleasant, 4 euros (1.5 g) and 7 euros (4 g), respectively, while the unit price per gram is more advantageous for the larger package.


  •  
  •  
  •  
Flattr this!

Psychoacoustic optimization of coolers… A gag? Physics

“Modifying” a cooler by replacing the fan with a relatively more efficient model may not always lead to the desired result. Sometimes you will get significantly less improvement than you would expect, other times you may even be worse off. This means that at equal noise levels, you will achieve lower cooling performance, and it doesn’t really matter what fan you use. Sometimes the design of the heatsink has the final say. Read more “Psychoacoustic optimization of coolers… A gag? Physics” »

  •  
  •  
  •  

SilentiumPC Spartan 5 Max tests under higher load (125 W)

We’ve already tested the SilentiumPC Spartan 5 Max CPU cooler, but with a fairly low-power processor. Its results thus merged with the simpler (Spartan 5) model without the “Max” in the name. On more powerful CPUs with more thermal output, however, the situation changes somewhat. How does the Spartan 5 Max compare to other coolers on a processor with 125 W, i.e. at the TDP level of Intel’s “K” models? Read more “SilentiumPC Spartan 5 Max tests under higher load (125 W)” »

  •  
  •  
  •  

Endorfy Navis F280 – Another bullseye among AIO coolers

The SilentiumPC brand is undergoing a change to Endorfy today, and along with this change is the launch of the new liquid all-in-one cooler from the Navis series. Similar to the Navis F240, today’s new addition features the excellent Fluctus series fans. Moreover, the Endorfy Navis F280 will also surely impress you with its attractive price tag of just under 100 EUR. What we have here is a solid potential for a very attractive price-performance ratio. Read more “Endorfy Navis F280 – Another bullseye among AIO coolers” »

  •  
  •  
  •  

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *