Performance tests
In the vast majority of Intel Core i5-13400F processor tests (including ours), you’ve studied the results of the variant built on the Golden Cove cores from the Alder Lake generation. But there is also an iteration from Raptor Lake (with Raptor Cove cores). However, this processor is harder to get hold of, its availability is considerably weaker, but it is obtainable. You’ll find out if it’s worth the extra effort from the comparative analysis.
Performance tests
Computing performance
Gaming performance
Continue: Memory and cache tests
- Contents
- Core i5-13400F SRMBG and SRMBN
- Performance tests
- Memory and cache tests
- CPU power draw curve
- Average CPU power draw
- Achieved CPU clock speeds
- CPU temperature
- Conclusion
Exactly what I feared. The B0 stepping just as other Raptors is overvolted. A bit more power draw, and higher temperatures. The same rule as to the rest of Raptor CPUs applies – their efficiency and heat generation disappoint if you can’t undervolt them, which thanks to our beloved Intel is now almost impossible.
It would be very cool if at least some version of this processor overclocked all cores to 4.6(max boost) at least on some motherboards.
True, Intel could push the all-core boost of the 65W Core i5s (including 13500/F) a bit… the leap from Ci5-13600K will remain very significant (and not cannibalize) even after the 500 MHz boost you suggested for Ci5-13400(F).
sejak kapan ada i5 13500F ?
kalau i5 13500 dan 13500T
itu baru ada.
You’re right. My mistake in the comment, for which I apologize. The 13500F really doesn’t exist (and there is only a 13500). Thanks for pointing it out.
thank you for the information
The hashtag #7nm is wrong, this CPU is 10nm, the process is called Intel 7 probably to mislead customers.
https://www.hwcooling.net/en/intel-core-i9-12900k-megatest-amd-in-2nd-place-again/#comment-2474
Since the CPUIDs of Raptor C0 and Alder C0 are different, there is a possibility that Raptor C0 and Alder C0 are not exactly the same chip.
In that case, the process rules may not be the same either.
(Core i5-8400 and Core i5-9400, which used the same chip, had matching CPUID 906EA)
To make a definitive determination as to whether or not they are the same chip, it is necessary to examine them under an electron microscope.
Raptor B0 (MAX P8 + E16) CPUID B0671
Raptor C0 (MAX P8 + E8) CPUID B06F2
Alder C0 (MAX P8 + E8) CPUID 90672
Alder H0 (MAX P6 + E0) CPUID 90675
That is true. There could be some revision or respin. Personally I expect it’s more likely to be only minor changes though. It could be a change isolated to some metal layer, but perhaps it could even be just a difference in the microcode version that is present on the ship out of the box (I think the base microcode is different, as an effect the 13th generation processors do not work with BCLK OC unlike the 12th gen versions even if they are based on C0 die, for example).
There could also be changes to the manufacturing process even within the original Intel 7 technology. There always are “knobs” that can be tweaked. I think the Ryzen 3000 “XT” refresh CPU were said to have some manufacturing process tweaks and changes, even though it was still all within the envelope of the N7 process tech originally used for prior SKUs.
Something like that could have been done by Intel to these C0 die 13th generation processors, too.