MSI GS66: All black razor with Core i9 and RTX 2080 Super

3D/PCMark and Unigine Heaven/Superposition

GS series includes a stylish and compact family of high-performance MSI laptops and the GS66 Stealth is its latest addition. I’ve always had a weakness for thin but powerful devices and that’s exactly what GS meets. However, with the high performance of Core i9 and RTX 2080 Super, the question arises as to how thermal management is handled. In less than 2 cm thin and about 2.1 kg body, it is really a challenge to deal with such powerful components.

3D/PC Mark a Unigine Heaven/Superposition

The combined PCMark 10 test shows a slightly lower performance of the GS66 by 5% compared to the Duo 15 and surprisingly also to the GS75 by 6%. However, the M15 is 12% slower.




Gaming-oriented 3DMark Firestrike and Time Spy show lower GS66 performance compared to Duo 15 and even M15. The Duo is 12/16% faster, M15 2/4% faster. On the contrary, the Sky diver is fully lead by the GS66 with a 38% lead over the Duo 15 and 78% over the M15. However, this test shows really special results on Asus devices, so it should be taken with a grain of salt. In contrast, Firestrike and Time Spy are beginning to confirm unflattering results from Geekbench Compute tests.






Tests focused on RTX and DLSS again show measurable differences between the GS66 and the competition. In Port Royal, MSI is 8% slower than M15 and 20% slower than Duo 15. In the DLSS test, the differences are 19/22 with M15 and 24/25% with Duo 15 for DLSS off/on. Thus, the undesirable trend we have seen in previous tests is confirmed again.



Unigine Heaven gaming tests again show higher performance of the competition compared to GS66. In Full HD it is 15% in favor of M15 and 24% for Duo 15. At 2K the difference between Duo 15 and GS66 is only 5%, on the contrary M15 increased the lead to 23%.



The latest graphic tests of Unigine Superposition do not change the situation. GS66 in Full HD loses 9% on M15 and 20% on Duo 15, in 4K the differences are even higher, 11 and 23%.

  •  
  •  
  •  
Flattr this!

The Ventus 3X (RTX 4070 TiS) case: Final vs. original VBIOS

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Ventus 3X graphics card came out with a BIOS that MSI (and even Nvidia) wasn’t happy with. After the second revision, there is the third, the last revision of the BIOS. This one increases the power limit to allow higher GPU clock speeds to be achieved. However, this comes at the cost of a bit lower power efficiency. To update or not to update? That’s for everyone to decide for themselves, if they get the chance. Read more “The Ventus 3X (RTX 4070 TiS) case: Final vs. original VBIOS” »

  •  
  •  
  •  

MSI officially about RTX 4070 Ti Super 16G Ventus 3X faults

MSI has released a statement saying that the RTX 4070 Ti Ventus 3X graphics cards did indeed come out with an untweaked BIOS that prevents this graphics card from achieving its maximum performance. However, there seems to be a fix already that could solve everything. Still… let’s revisit this topic and try to sort through the possible technical reasons that cause the significant fluctuation in the performance of the cheapest three-fan MSI RTX 4070 Ti Super. Read more “MSI officially about RTX 4070 Ti Super 16G Ventus 3X faults” »

  •  
  •  
  •  

MSI RTX 4070 Ti Super 16G Ventus 3X: Big cooler w/o a markup

The biggest hardware changes compared to non-Super cards concern the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super. What’s different is the GPU, the amount of GDDR6X memory or the width of the memory bus. We have the RTX 4070 Ti Super in one of the cheapest non-reference designs, the Ventus 3X, for analysis and it will be about “reputation repair” as well. MSI has tarnished it a bit in this line of graphics cards in the past, but now it’s a very attractive solution. Read more “MSI RTX 4070 Ti Super 16G Ventus 3X: Big cooler w/o a markup” »

  •  
  •  
  •  

One comment Add comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *