Aimed at lower temperatures. BeQuiet! Pure Base 501 Airflow

A simple, yet “effective” case. That’s one way you could title an article analyzing the BeQuiet! Pure Base 501 Airflow (BG074). The test model features solid metal panels on both sides – non-transparent – each lined with sound-dampening material. Foam. In short, you’re dealing with a design rooted in the old school, something increasingly rare these days. Despite that, the purchase price of this case remains relatively low, close to the ground.

While the recently reviewed “DX” model represents the top of the BeQuiet! Pure Base 501 lineup, the “Airflow” variant is more of a basic entry. You’ll recognize this right away by the fact that both side panels are made of metal (instead of one being glass), which some users may actually see as an advantage. And the lower price – in line with the more modest features – is likely attractive to just about everyone. While several design elements clearly indicate cost savings, there’s still a strong emphasis on cooling. After all, there’s a reason this case carries the “Airflow” designation.

Wordpress Table Plugin

External details…

The BeQuiet! Pure Base 501 Airflow sports a classic tower design – measuring 463 mm in height (including feet), 450 mm in depth, and 231 mm in width. Unlike its DX sibling, the Airflow model features solid steel side panels instead of tempered glass, and it omits any ARGB lighting elements. Where the DX version includes light guides running along the front panel, the Airflow model does away with them entirely, opting instead for a fully perforated front.

The perforated front is covered with holes approximately 1.6 mm in diameter. This perforation spans the entire surface. On the Pure Base 501 DX, the center of the panel and areas with light guides are solid, meaning non-breathable. This makes the Pure Base 501 Airflow panel more breathable. The question, of course, is how it impacts cooling. The effect on airflow is certainly positive, though not dramatically so – the improvement is relatively minor. Still, it’s fair to say that in terms of front panel cooling, there’s some “improvement.”

Connectivity-wise, the case keeps up with current standards. The front panel features a 10-gigabit USB-C port (standard 3.2 Gen 2), flanked by two USB-A ports with 5 Gb/s speeds. Both standards take full advantage of the internal connectors available for front panel use, maximizing compatibility with what motherboards can generally support. That said, it’s ideal to use the second 19-pin USB 3.2 Gen 1 connector as well, but many motherboards don’t include this header, which would leave some ports inactive anyway. As configured, it supports everything a modern motherboard typically offers – assuming, of course, it’s a newer model.

Both side panels are solid with no openings – including the right one. This design preserves air pressure within the case and also prevents noise from escaping through any hypothetical vents (as would happen with perforated panels), making for quieter operation. Especially with the Pure Base 501 line, as seen in the DX variant review, the metal side panels are lined with sound-dampening material. This is present here as well, which we’ll revisit in chapter two of this article.

At the bottom of the case is a large dust filter. It’s made of nylon and features a finer structure (which improves its effectiveness in capturing very small particles) and can be washed with water.

Cleaning the filter is straightforward, as is removing it. It’s secured by side-mounted brackets protruding from the case’s frame. These form a sort of rail system that works quite well – the filter slides out smoothly and is just as easy to slide back in. For added ease of handling, there’s a grip on one of the shorter edges.

Please note: The article continues in the following chapters.


The end, or just the beginning? 100 fans in HWCooling tests

Our database now includes one hundred fans—75 in the 120 mm format and 25 models with a physical size of 140 mm. In this article, we have compiled all data into unified charts. What was once separated for clarity is now brought together again, and the commentary will also include a… look ahead regarding fan testing. But we can already reveal that there is still a lot more to come. Read more “The end, or just the beginning? 100 fans in HWCooling tests” »

Pure Loop 3 360. „Cheap“ BeQuiet! AIO in 100+ tests

BeQuiet!’s most affordable liquid cooler with a 360-millimeter radiator. The price is already quite low, around one hundred euros, and a large radiator cooled by three fans is a good foundation for attractive results. And indeed, the results are just that. The cooling efficiency-to-price ratio here is truly impressive. The BeQuiet! Pure Loop 360 cooler is worth your attention. Read more “Pure Loop 3 360. „Cheap“ BeQuiet! AIO in 100+ tests” »

BeQuiet! Pure Base 501 DX: A mainstream case with ARGB

A relatively small PC case with the potential to attract the masses. That is, if you care at least a little about colorful lighting. Otherwise, we’re still in the “midi-tower” class, where price accessibility also plays a role. Within BeQuiet!’s product lines, this case still belongs to the lowest (Pure Base), although it keeps a “higher” standard throughout. There’s nothing that would suggest excessive cuts or visible flaws. Read more “BeQuiet! Pure Base 501 DX: A mainstream case with ARGB” »

Comments (7) Add comment

  1. Hello. I red this review and I want to buy this case, but I’m worried that the Pure Wing 3 fan is approved but not top-notch.
    So, which fan is good upgrade?
    Reasonable options in my country are Momentum 14, Arctic P14 Pro, P14 Max or NF-A14x25 G2.
    the CPU and the GPU of my PC will be 265k with air cooler and 5070 Ti.

    1. What exactly are you expecting from a fan? The Pure Wings 3 is aerodynamically excellent, and personally, I would not replace these fans. Of course, the FD Momentum 14 and Noctua NF-A14x25 G2 are more advanced in terms of technical sophistication—but primarily in other areas, not necessarily in aerodynamic design. You can swap out the original PW3 fans, but you likely won’t see much of a gain in cooling efficiency. That said, you might end up happier with the acoustic profile. I can’t say for sure—that’s something very individual. 🙂

      1. Thank you for your reply.
        I would like to make my PC more quiet, but surely as you say, that’s individual thing…
        I will try listening to the noise of some fans and I will install fans of which I prefer.

        1. Analyzing sound based on analog recordings is highly debatable. Distortions already occur at the level of speakers. That’s exactly why we don’t include audio recordings in our tests and instead provide spectrograms, which everyone can read the same way. In other words, they show the noise levels at specific frequencies. Naturally, they’re more complex to read and interpret, but once you know how to work with them, they are much more accurate than subjective listening. 🙂

          1. … but, maybe he meant listening live … and not from recordings on the internet 🙂
            … and the recording, although distorted, still gives some idea of the pitch of the dominant tone 😛

  2. I have this case. I installed the included fans + 1 third all as top and rear exhaust and reduced the rpm by about 40% via a Noctua NA-FC1 (to not reduce the pressure from the intake fans too much). For the front I installed 3 120mm Shadow Wings 2, also limited a little via Noctua ULN adapter cables. So even at full blast the PC remains quite quiet and is otherwise near silent.

    1. Thanks for sharing your user experience. Yes, having the system fans run at lower airflow rates is often sufficient—it won’t limit the cooling. You’ve got your setup figured out well. It’s quiet, and that was the goal. 🙂

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *