CPS PCCooler F9 R120: Rising to the top with 30 mm (of thickness)

We can state that, regardless of noise levels (indeed very high at maximum), the CPS PCCooler F9 R120 is the highest airflow fan in the 30 mm-and-below profile category. Yes, even the Phanteks T30 comes out “worse” here. However, if your priority is the highest possible airflow at low noise, the picture changes—and it’s not such a happy one, especially with obstacles. That will become clearer in the detailed analysis.

… and of airflow

With airflow measurements, we can well explain why the test tunnel is shaped the way it is. It doesn’t consist of two parts just so that the “exhaust” can be conveniently clogged for pressure measurements. The anemometer (i.e. the wind speed measuring instrument) is held together by two parts, two formations, through the flanges.

The front part, at the beginning of which the fan is mounted, becomes steadily narrower and from about two thirds of the way through the cross-section is smaller than that of a 120 mm fan. The reason for this is that the cross-section of the anemometer is always smaller than that of the fans tested. The taper towards the anemometer fan is as smooth as could be chosen and the tunnel walls are smooth. This has minimized the occurrence of unnatural turbulence.

The difference between the cross section at the intake (fan under test) and at the constriction point (anemometer) also means a difference in dynamic pressure, the principles of the Venturi effect apply here. In order to avoid distortion at this level and to ensure that the fan airflow is not different from what it actually is, the Bernoulli equation must be applied to the measured values (for maximum accuracy, the calculation also takes into account the internal cross-sectional area of the anemometer, i.e. its inactive part ). After all this, it is again possible to confront our results with the paper parameters.

We use an Extech AN300 anemometer with a large 100 mm fan for the measurements. Its big advantage over other anemometers is that it is made for bidirectional sensing. This allows tests at different fan orientations. However, the “pull” position is more suitable or accurate for measurements, even though it may not seem so at first glance, but we’ll explain.

Here, we get to the second part of the tunnel, the part behind the anemometer. It is part of the whole device, mainly to allow a laminar flow of air to arrive at the impeller of the anemometer. Otherwise, uncontrolled side whirls would be reflected in the results, which are inconsistent with accurate measurements. Therefore, we will test the flow in the pull position. If anyone would like us to elaborate more on this topic, we can elaborate further at any time in the discussion below the article. Ask away. 🙂

The rear of the tunnel ensures, among other things, that the air supply to the anemometer fan is laminar

In regard to the anemometer, we shall return for a bit to noise measurements and to setting modes according to fixed noise levels. It may have occurred to you as you were reading that the anemometer fan is also a source of sound that needs to be filtered out when measuring fans. For this reason, we insert a securing pad between the frame and the anemometer fan before each measurement and mode setting according to the fixed noise level. This, by the way, also holds the anemometer fan during static pressure measurements.


Contents

Comments (5) Add comment

  1. Hi,

    I don’t understand the chart Motor Power 12v 100% PWM and Fan power draw max speed.
    Should they be the same watts?
    One says 5.41 watts the other 15.23 watts do they rally draw that much power?

    Thanks

    1. In one case (Motor Power), the higher value appears because the motor, due to braking, has to overcome significantly greater resistance than it does during regular operation at 12 V or 100% PWM control (which are effectively the same). The motor power measurements are meant to illustrate the difference between the best and worst scenarios in terms of friction the fan must overcome. The operating power consumption of an older fan will be higher because friction increases over time with use—and it’s good to know how far the motor’s capabilities extend. 🙂

      1. while we’re at it, 😉
        It would probably be appropriate for manufacturers to limit max.motor power to 12W, cause many 4-pin fan headers on motherboards have max. current of only 1A, right?
        …or what is your opinion on it? 😛

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *