DeepCool FT14: More revealing (than others) and more capable

It took years, but finally DeepCool managed to modernize its fans in the 140mm format as well. The DeepCool FT14s present themselves with very attractive specs – both the airflow and static pressure are above standard, but the key is how these fans will fare in practice compared to competing models. What makes the FT14 visually different from those at first glance is that you can see inside the motor.

Reality vs. specifications

Explanatory note: For a quick overview of how manufacturers “spice up” specifications, we have a sort of “truthfulness” coefficient. We calculate this by putting our measured values in proportion to those given in the specifications by the fan manufacturers. A result of “1.00” means that the claimed parameters match the values we have recorded. After such a finding, we can conclude that the manufacturer has done his job honestly and the way he presents the fan agrees. The more the coefficient number is different from 1.00, the less accurate the claimed specifications are. Of course, the better case for the user is if the coefficient is higher than 1.00 (and it is, for example, 1.20), then the real parameters exceed the paper ones. Conversely, if the coefficient starts with zero, then the fan does not reach the parameters on paper. For example, a value of 0.80 means that the real airflow or static pressure is 20 % lower than the manufacturer claims. If a value is missing from the chart, it is because the fan manufacturer does not specify the airflow or static pressure.



Contents

Comments (5) Add comment

  1. That’s unexpected results. I would have guessed it performs better on radiators than vs no obstacles, but it’s the opposite!

    Is the buzzing noise only present under ~750 RPM, or is it there across the whole speed range? On higher dBA settings, I can still see some of the peaks at 1-2 Khz.

    1. There will probably be some buzzing at higher speeds, but because of the diminishing contribution to the total, in contrast with the aerodynamic noise (which drowns out these sounds) it fades out alongside other, significantly noisier frequencies. The buzzing is, of course, more pronounced at lower speeds (like ~750 rpm), at the limit of minimum rpm. But we don’t have a spectrogram for those. 🙂

    2. Noticeable buzzing noise is present till the 20% of PWM or ~660RPM, have three of those on a 45mm rad :/

  2. I mean buzzing is starting from 20% of PWM and 660RPM, and after 800-900RPM buzzing noise doesn’t bother because airflow noise is louder.

    Little correction 🙂

    1. Thank you for sharing your user experience. Yes, the buzzing noise also occurs at higher speeds, and the question is to what extent it is disruptive at which speed compared to the aerodynamic noise. This can be evaluated differently by everyone, as it is subjective.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *