24GB/48GB DDR5 modules don’t work with Ryzen CPUs, fix coming?

New memory modules with non-binary capacity only work on Intel platform so far

In the past, Intel processors could not run newer higher-capacity DDR2 and DDR3 modules, while AMD processors worked. That’s why we were sort of assuming that the currently appearing DDR5 modules with unusual “non-binary” capacities would just automatically work on AMD platforms. But that’s not true, it seems that they only work with Intel processors for now and Ryzen 7000s will only be able to use them after a future update.

During the release of these modules, press releases were issued by some board manufacturers announcing the addition of support for these modules on Intel 600 and 700 chipset boards for Core 12th and 13th generation processors. Or even support being already present in current BIOS versions. However, there was no mention of support on the AMD platform. It turns out there was a reason for that. These modules do not work on AM5 boards yet.

Read more: Corsair begins selling 24GB and 48GB DDR5 modules. You can have 192GB of RAM in your desktop with them

It’s probably not an issue of reaching the maximum supported capacity of 128GB on mainstream boards with four slots, but rather something to do with the 24Gb DRAM chips themselves. There was a report on Twitter from enthusiast and leaker MEGAsizeGPU who tried a 48GB Corsair Vengeance set (a pair of 24GB modules), and even at that total capacity, the RAM didn’t work.

They state that their Asus ROG Strix B650E-E Gaming Wi-Fi recognizes the modules and shows the correct capacity after entering the UEFI. Actually, the fact that the UEFI can be accessed and the monitor display works, itself shows there is some basic functionality working already, so the system can run with the memory to some extent. But after installing the modules, Windows doesn’t boot, it fails during startup. This would usually be a sign of a some software issue, but here it’s probably due to some interaction of software with the processor, RAM and board firmware.

What is preventing Windows from booting is not likely to be a fatal incompatibility and support for these modules should still be made available by board manufacturers or AMD directly, at some point in the future. However, it’s a pity (and a mistake) that the support wasn’t ready before the release of these products as AMD should have known about this issue and the coming hardware that would trigger it in advance. These non-binary sized DRAM chips and 24GB/48GB modules were first announced years ago.

48GB and 24GB modules should work with the next AGESA update

According to another Twitter source, Chi11eddog, support for these memory modules should allegedly be forthcoming in the next version of AMD’s AGESA code – according to Chi11eddog, the version in question should be AGESA 1.0.0.7 for the AM5 platform. The board manufacturers will need to release new firmware updates based on this AGESA for the individual AM5 boards after that. However, we don’t yet have information on when to expect these AGESA 1.0.0.7-based UEFI updates. But at least it looks like a solution is in the works, even if it ‘s going to arrive somewhat late.

Sources: Chi11eddog, MEGAsizeGPU, Tom’s Hardware (1, 2)

English translation and edit by Jozef Dudáš


  •  
  •  
  •  
Flattr this!

RDNA 4 Radeon GPUs: specs and performance of both chips leaked

Previously, new GPU generations were coming in 2-year cycles, which would mean a launch this fall. However, Nvidia’s roadmap has put the GeForce RTX 5000 launch into 2025 some time ago. AMD is still unclear on the launch date of Radeon RX 8000s, but there’s some chance it’s within this year. The specs of these GPUs using RDNA 4 architecture have now surfaced on the internet. If they are real, it might even point to a release relatively soon. Read more “RDNA 4 Radeon GPUs: specs and performance of both chips leaked” »

  •  
  •  
  •  

AMD to produce lowend CPUs and GPUs using Samsung’s 4nm node

Back when the groundbreaking Ryzen processors launched, AMD was still manufacturing almost all of its products at GlobalFoundries, with the exception of chipsets designed by ASMedia. But now, by contrast, it is almost fully tied to the fortunes of TSMC. However, it looks like there could soon be some diversification in place. Samsung-made chips are coming to low-cost processors and they’ll also appear in Radeon graphics cards later. Read more “AMD to produce lowend CPUs and GPUs using Samsung’s 4nm node” »

  •  
  •  
  •  

AMD’s Zen 5 is said to be 40% faster over Zen 4. Can that be real?

The day when AMD releases processors with the new Zen 5 core, allegedly the biggest upgrade since the first Zen, is closing in. Their performance remains quite unclear though – on the one hand AMD’s materials talk about a 10–15% or a little bit more performance increase per 1 MHz, but at the same time there are rumors talking about 30% or now even 40% performance increase. So what to believe and what to watch out for? Read more “AMD’s Zen 5 is said to be 40% faster over Zen 4. Can that be real?” »

  •  
  •  
  •  

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *