Analysis: What have we learned from motherboard tests

... more efficient VRM does not equal lower power input

Over time, we have tested ten motherboards with Intel B660 and Z690 chipsets in great detail. From more than 5000 different measurements, we can thus confidently deny some speculations that are usually spread on the Internet from the ignorance of the authors of articles or comments (in discussions). But this is natural. The less substantial the reviews are, the more fertile ground they create for various confusions.

… more efficient VRM does not equal lower power input

In the context of measuring CPU power draw, there is one more thing you need to know. Namely, how big the difference in total power draw can be for the same computational (or gaming) power, which already includes VRM inefficiencies.

For this reason, we use sufficiently oversized boards so that the VRM efficiency does not cause significant differences between processors of different performance. However, VRM efficiency is not the only thing that determines what power draw you measure.

Boards with typically “strong” VRMs overdrive the power supply a bit in order to achieve the highest possible stability. Conversely, some boards with “weaker” VRM (with lower current carrying capacity) push it in the opposite direction. That is, the power supply is optimized to be as low as possible, so as to heat up the voltage regulators as little as possible for self-preservation.

A prime example is the Gigabyte B660 Aorus Master DDR4, with which the lowest power draw is achieved with the Core i9-12900K, although this motherboard does not have the most efficient VRM. It is much more efficient with the Asus ROG Z690 Maximus Hero with higher measured power draw.

In both cases, the difference in computational power is significantly less than the difference in input power. Hence, in processor tests it makes no sense to fixate on very small differences in power draw, these can vary from board to board and there is no way to fight with limiting this bias. But it is important to know about it, to be aware of it.


  •  
  •  
  •  
Flattr this!

How we measured computer PSUs. The acoustic part

The PSU tests, which will be published shortly, will also include a detailed noise analysis. Each model has a different fan, a different grille in front of it, and operates at a different speed under the same loads, all of which shapes the different noise character. In order to make everything clear and accurate, spectral analysis of the sound is essential. This tells us which frequencies are noisier and how each PSU actually “sounds”. Read more “How we measured computer PSUs. The acoustic part” »

  •  
  •  
  •  

How we measured computer PSUs. The electrical part

The time has come to introduce the testing methodology for computer PSUs. We will divide this into two articles, where the first will cover procedures for obtaining key electrical quantities (i.e. surrounding efficiency, voltage regulation, voltage ripple, etc.). A separate sequel will then focus on the analysis of acoustic profiles. But now on to the purpose for which we travelled to the external testlab. Read more “How we measured computer PSUs. The electrical part” »

  •  
  •  
  •  

HWC’s testlab #1: New average CPU score measuring method

Since the last processor test (including) we have changed the way we evaluate the overall or average performance of all games. You suggested to us in the discussion half a year ago that it would be better for all games to have the same weight. However, the right time to incorporate this new calculation came only recently. So how do we actually do it and why is it better than before? Read more “HWC’s testlab #1: New average CPU score measuring method” »

  •  
  •  
  •  

Comments (3) Add comment

  1. Thanks for the article, quite interesting.
    I wonder how much of a difference makes where the M.2 SSD is installed. I ask because the topmost slot is right above the GPU which under stress produces a lot of heat.
    Would having the SSD on the lower slot make it considerably cooler?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *