Analysis: What have we learned from motherboard tests

Over time, we have tested ten motherboards with Intel B660 and Z690 chipsets in great detail. From more than 5000 different measurements, we can thus confidently deny some speculations that are usually spread on the Internet from the ignorance of the authors of articles or comments (in discussions). But this is natural. The less substantial the reviews are, the more fertile ground they create for various confusions.

USB port tests

The picture is similar for the USB connectors, of which we are testing the external ones (on the rear panel). You don’t have to worry about ASRock giving you slower ports than, say, Gigabyte. Speeds across standards are always the same, or with differences of less than 1 %.







On rare occasions, however, you may find that you get significantly faster USB ports than you thought you had. For example, the MSI Pro Z690-A DDR4 is presented in the specifications with fewer 5 Gb USB 3.2 Gen 1 ports than it actually has. According to the specs, there should only be two to four USB 2.0 ports. But that ratio is reversed, four are faster ports with 5 Gb speeds, although two of them deceive with the body and mask the black color, typical for USB 2.0 ports.

The USB ports, stacked in four in a row, on the MSI Pro Z690-A DDR4 board are all 5-gigabit (standard 3.2. gen. 1) and not just two of them, as it looks like. In this case, however, it’s a nice bonus

This is probably due to cheaper production (with that faster configuration), as they don’t mass produce two different designs, but only one, shared with the more expensive boards. But at the same time, MSI probably needs to increase the attractiveness of the higher-end, higher-margin boards to give more incentive to buy them. And that’s because of the larger number of faster ports, for example, which this board actually has (MSI Pro Z690-A DDR4).

Noctua on measuring fan noise: Different angles, different results

Noise measurements are an extremely complex topic. Imagine you have ten different sound sources. The noise from each will radiate through the space in different ways, and measuring ‘which is the noisiest’ and coming up with a clear verdict on that is a really hard nut to crack. To give you a better idea, we’ve interviewed Noctua. Different measurement techniques yield potentially different and sometimes contradictory conclusions. Read more “Noctua on measuring fan noise: Different angles, different results” »

Returning to PC case tests (comment on methodology)

Probably as early as next month, in September, we will release an analysis of the first case that will go through our new testing methodology. We already have a rough outline of it and we would like to present to you what we are going to do and how and why we are going to do it. This is also to give you a chance to comment on things you might think are missing that we could easily incorporate into the standard concept. Read more “Returning to PC case tests (comment on methodology)” »

How we measured computer PSUs. The acoustic part

The PSU tests, which will be published shortly, will also include a detailed noise analysis. Each model has a different fan, a different grille in front of it, and operates at a different speed under the same loads, all of which shapes the different noise character. In order to make everything clear and accurate, spectral analysis of the sound is essential. This tells us which frequencies are noisier and how each PSU actually “sounds”. Read more “How we measured computer PSUs. The acoustic part” »

Comments (3) Add comment

  1. Thanks for the article, quite interesting.
    I wonder how much of a difference makes where the M.2 SSD is installed. I ask because the topmost slot is right above the GPU which under stress produces a lot of heat.
    Would having the SSD on the lower slot make it considerably cooler?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *