GeForce RTX 5060 Ti PCIe Lanes Problem: Do You Have This Issue?

While testing the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti, I encountered a recurring issue with active PCIe lanes. On PCIe 5.0 motherboards, the card often fails to run in x8 mode even in a x16 slot, starting instead in slower x1, x2, or x4 modes. The same behavior occurred across three RTX 5060 Ti models from MSI, Gainward, and Asus. The issue likely stems from how these motherboards handle compatibility with PCIe 5.0 graphics cards using eight lanes.

Performance comparison: PCIe 5.0 x1 vs. PCIe 5.0 x8 on the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti

Until now, we’ve mostly covered theory, detection, and synthetic tests, which aren’t always a true reflection of reality. So I ran a set of gaming benchmarks with the card operating in PCIe 5.0 x1 and PCIe 5.0 x8 modes. The performance difference was noticeable – usually between 0% and 8%, but occasionally dipping as much as 20%.

Gainward GF RTX 5060 Ti Python III, 16 GB, x8 Gainward GF RTX 5060 Ti Python III, 16 GB, x1 RTX 5060 Ti, PCIe x1 vs PCIe x8 difference
Cyberpunk 2077, Ultra, scaling off, 1920 × 1080 124.2 fps 118.7 fps 95.6 %
Cyberpunk 2077, Ultra, FSR3 nat. AA, 1920 × 1080 87.0 fps 86.0 fps 98.9 %
Cyberpunk 2077, Ultra, FSR3 bal., 1920 × 1080 160.8 fps 150.5 fps 93.6 %
Cyberpunk 2077, Ultra, FSR3 bal., fg 2×, 1920 × 1080 269.8 fps 253.8 fps 94.1 %
Cyberpunk 2077, RT Ultra, scaling off, 1920 × 1080 55.3 fps 53.2 fps 96.2 %
Cyberpunk 2077, RT Ultra, FSR3 nat. AA, 1920 × 1080 53.0 fps 51.3 fps 96.8 %
Cyberpunk 2077, RT Ultra, FSR3 bal., 1920 × 1080 105.0 fps 97.7 fps 93.0 %
Cyberpunk 2077, RT Ultra, FSR3 bal., fg 2×, 1920 × 1080 183.5 fps 173.1 fps 94.3 %
Cyberpunk 2077, RT Overdrive, scaling off, 1920 × 1080 30,5 fps 30,1 fps 98,7 %
Cyberpunk 2077, RT Overdrive, FSR3 nat. AA, 1920 × 1080 29,8 fps 29,4 fps 98,7 %
Cyberpunk 2077, RT Overdrive, FSR3 perf., 1920 × 1080 79,4 fps 74,9 fps 94,3 %
Cyberpunk 2077, RT Overdrive, FSR3 perf., fg 2×, 1920 × 1080 135,7 fps 135,9 fps 100,1 %
Cyberpunk 2077, Ultra, scaling off, 2560 × 1440 78,9 fps 76,4 fps 96,8 %
Cyberpunk 2077, Ultra, FSR3 nat. AA, 2560 × 1440 51,5 fps 50,5 fps 98,1 %
Cyberpunk 2077, Ultra, FSR3 bal., 2560 × 1440 113,7 fps 109,0 fps 95,9 %
Cyberpunk 2077, Ultra, FSR3 bal., fg 2×, 2560 × 1440 189,3 fps 184,9 fps 97,7 %
Cyberpunk 2077, RT Ultra, scaling off, 2560 × 1440 34,2 fps 33,6 fps 98,2 %
Cyberpunk 2077, RT Ultra, FSR3 nat. AA, 2560 × 1440 32,9 fps 32,1 fps 97,6 %
Cyberpunk 2077, RT Ultra, FSR3 bal., 2560 × 1440 71,5 fps 68,1 fps 95,2 %
Cyberpunk 2077, RT Ultra, FSR3 bal., fg 2×, 2560 × 1440 120,9 fps 120,0 fps 99,3 %
Cyberpunk 2077, RT Overdrive, scaling off, 2560 × 1440 18,5 fps 18,3 fps 98,9 %
Cyberpunk 2077, RT Overdrive, FSR3 nat. AA, 2560 × 1440 18,0 fps 17,8 fps 98,9 %
Cyberpunk 2077, RT Overdrive, FSR3 perf., 2560 × 1440 53,3 fps 51,2 fps 96,1 %
Cyberpunk 2077, RT Overdrive, FSR3 perf., fg 2×, 2560 × 1440 89,7 fps 91,8 fps 102,3 %
Cyberpunk 2077, Ultra, scaling off, 3840 × 2160 34,1 fps 33,7 fps 98,8 %
Cyberpunk 2077, Ultra, FSR3 nat. AA, 3840 × 2160 21,7 fps 21,8 fps 100,5 %
Cyberpunk 2077, Ultra, FSR3 bal., 3840 × 2160 56,3 fps 54,8 fps 97,3 %
Cyberpunk 2077, Ultra, FSR3 bal., fg 2×, 3840 × 2160 89,2 fps 88,8 fps 99,6 %
Cyberpunk 2077, RT Ultra, scaling off, 3840 × 2160 16,2 fps 16,1 fps 99,4 %
Cyberpunk 2077, RT Ultra, FSR3 nat. AA, 3840 × 2160 15,6 fps 15,1 fps 96,8 %
Cyberpunk 2077, RT Ultra, FSR3 bal., 3840 × 2160 36,9 fps 35,9 fps 97,3 %
Cyberpunk 2077, RT Ultra, FSR3 bal., fg 2×, 3840 × 2160 60,8 fps 60,1 fps 98,8 %
Cyberpunk 2077, RT Overdrive, scaling off, 3840 × 2160 8,6 fps 8,6 fps 100,0 %
Cyberpunk 2077, RT Overdrive, FSR3 nat. AA, 3840 × 2160 8,4 fps 8,3 fps 98,8 %
Cyberpunk 2077, RT Overdrive, FSR3 perf., 3840 × 2160 27,7 fps 27,2 fps 98,2 %
Cyberpunk 2077, RT Overdrive, FSR3 perf., fg 2×, 3840 × 2160 45,2 fps 44,9 fps 99,3 %
Cyberpunk 2077, RT Ultra, DLAA, transf., 1920 × 1080 52,2 fps 50,1 fps 96,0 %
Cyberpunk 2077, RT Ultra, DLSS bal., transf., 1920 × 1080 101,1 fps 92,0 fps 91,0 %
Cyberpunk 2077, RT Ultra, DLSS bal., transf., fg 2×, 1920 × 1080 163,1 fps 151,4 fps 92,8 %
Cyberpunk 2077, RT Ultra, DLSS bal. + frame gen. 4×, 1920 × 1080 282,7 fps 266,0 fps 94,1 %
Cyberpunk 2077, RT Overdrive, DLAA, transf., 1920 × 1080 30,7 fps 29,8 fps 97,1 %
Cyberpunk 2077, RT Overdrive, DLSS perf., transf., 1920 × 1080 81,0 fps 74,4 fps 91,9 %
Cyberpunk 2077, RT Overdrive, DLSS perf., transf., fg 2×, 1920 × 1080 134,9 fps 126,4 fps 93,7 %
Cyberpunk 2077, RT Overdrive, DLSS perf., transf., fg 4×, 1920 × 1080 239,0 fps 226,0 fps 94,6 %
Cyberpunk 2077, RT Ultra, DLAA, transf., 2560 × 1440 32,0 fps 32,0 fps 100,0 %
Cyberpunk 2077, RT Ultra, DLSS bal., transf., 2560 × 1440 69,0 fps 65,0 fps 94,2 %
Cyberpunk 2077, RT Ultra, DLSS bal., transf., fg 2×, 2560 × 1440 108,0 fps 104,0 fps 96,3 %
Cyberpunk 2077, RT Ultra, DLSS bal., transf., fg 4×, 2560 × 1440 185,0 fps 179,0 fps 96,8 %
Cyberpunk 2077, RT Overdrive, DLAA, transf., 2560 × 1440 19,0 fps 18,0 fps 94,7 %
Cyberpunk 2077, RT Overdrive, DLSS perf., transf., 2560 × 1440 55,0 fps 52,0 fps 94,5 %
Cyberpunk 2077, RT Overdrive, DLSS perf., transf., fg 2×, 2560 × 1440 90,0 fps 86,0 fps 95,6 %
Cyberpunk 2077, RT Overdrive, DLSS perf., transf., fg 4×, 2560 × 1440 157,0 fps 151,0 fps 96,2 %
Cyberpunk 2077, RT Ultra, DLAA, transf., 3840 × 2160 15,0 fps 15,0 fps 100,0 %
Cyberpunk 2077, RT Ultra, DLSS bal., transf., 3840 × 2160 36,0 fps 35,0 fps 97,2 %
Cyberpunk 2077, RT Ultra, DLSS bal., transf., fg 2×, 3840 × 2160 60,0 fps 58,0 fps 96,7 %
Cyberpunk 2077, RT Ultra, DLSS bal. + frame gen. 4×, 3840 × 2160 104,0 fps 101,0 fps 97,1 %
Cyberpunk 2077, RT Overdrive, DLAA, transf., 3840 × 2160 8,0 fps 8,0 fps 100,0 %
Cyberpunk 2077, RT Overdrive, DLSS perf., transf., 3840 × 2160 29,0 fps 28,0 fps 96,6 %
Cyberpunk 2077, RT Overdrive, DLSS perf., transf., fg 2×, 3840 × 2160 50,0 fps 48,0 fps 96,0 %
Cyberpunk 2077, RT Overdrive, DLSS perf., transf., fg 4×, 3840 × 2160 88,0 fps 87,0 fps 98,9 %
F1 24, high, TAA, 1920 × 1080 183,0 fps 148,0 fps 80,9 %
F1 24, high, TAA, 2560 × 1440 147,3 fps 129,0 fps 87,6 %
F1 24, high, TAA, 3480 × 2160 96,0 fps 93,3 fps 97,2 %
F1 24, ultra high, TAA, 1920 × 1080 73,0 fps 70,3 fps 96,3 %
F1 24, ultra high, TAA, 2560 × 1440 52,7 fps 51,3 fps 97,3 %
F1 24, ultra high, TAA, 3480 × 2160 28,0 fps 28,0 fps 100,0 %
F1 24, ultra high, FSR bal., 1920 × 1080 95,7 fps 89,3 fps 93,3 %
F1 24, ultra high, FSR bal., 2560 × 1440 79,7 fps 75,7 fps 95,0 %
F1 24, ultra high, FSR bal., 3480 × 2160 52,7 fps 51,7 fps 98,1 %
F1 24, ultra high, FSR bal. + frame gen. 2×, 1920 × 1080 169,7 fps 146,0 fps 86,0 %
F1 24, ultra high, FSR bal. + frame gen. 2×, 2560 × 1440 137,7 fps 123,0 fps 89,3 %
F1 24, ultra high, FSR bal. + frame gen. 2×, 3480 × 2160 86,0 fps 85,0 fps 98,8 %
F1 24, DLAA, 1920 × 1080 59,0 fps 57,0 fps 96,6 %
F1 24, DLAA, 2560 × 1440 44,3 fps 43,0 fps 97,1 %
F1 24, DLAA, 3840 × 2160 25,0 fps 25,0 fps 100,0 %
F1 24, DLSS Bal., 1920 × 1080 82,0 fps 76,3 fps 93,0 %
F1 24, DLSS Bal., 2560 × 1440 69,0 fps 64,0 fps 92,8 %
F1 24, DLSS Bal., 3840 × 2160 48,0 fps 46,0 fps 95,8 %
F1 24, DLSS Bal., frame gen. 2×, 1920 × 1080 140,0 fps 132,3 fps 94,5 %
F1 24, DLSS Bal., frame gen. 2×, 2560 × 1440 112,0 fps 105,0 fps 93,8 %
F1 24, DLSS Bal., frame gen. 2×, 3840 × 2160 69,0 fps 68,0 fps 98,6 %
Metro Exodus EE, Extreme, 1920 × 1080 60,2 fps 56,1 fps 93,2 %
Metro Exodus EE, Extreme, 2560 × 1440 50,6 fps 47,5 fps 93,9 %
Metro Exodus EE, Extreme, 3840 × 2160 34,6 fps 33,0 fps 95,4 %

Contents

AMD reportedly preparing new AM5 boards or chipsets for summer

AMD is expected to launch the first Ryzen desktop CPUs based on the new Zen 6 architecture either in autumn this year or early next year. Until now, there had been no indications that these CPUs would also bring the arrival of new chipsets. However, it now appears that a new wave of AM5 socket motherboards for these processors is in preparation. These models could come equipped with new capabilities and potentially a new chipset. Read more “AMD reportedly preparing new AM5 boards or chipsets for summer” »

x86 ACE Instructions: AMD Zen 7 core’s AI acceleration detailed

Longtime rivals AMD and Intel have established a joint consortium seeking to make their x86 processors and their future extensions more compatible instead of using the differences and exclusive features as (anti)competitive advantages. In autumn they settled on several extensions to be made standard: AVX10/AVX-512, APX, ChkTag, FRED, and also the ACE matrix extension for AI compute, about which very little had been known until now. Read more “x86 ACE Instructions: AMD Zen 7 core’s AI acceleration detailed” »

Radeon GPU drivers for Linux will finally get HDMI 2.1 support

Valve’s incoming Steam Machine gaming PC/console drew new attention to one long‑standing weakness of the Linux ecosystem: HDMI 2.1 support. It works with Nvidia hardware (thanks to closed‑source drivers and firmware), but the open‑source drivers used for Radeon GPUs could not support it because the HDMI Forum did not allow HDMI 2.1 support in open‑source code. However, it looks like this problem may finally be coming to an end. Read more “Radeon GPU drivers for Linux will finally get HDMI 2.1 support” »

Comments (3) Add comment

  1. The 8GB version is the one you should be testing for PCIe bottleneck, not the 16GB.

    1. I don’t think it matters much in this case. Interestingly, the biggest performance drops happen with settings that are actually less demanding on memory.

  2. Mobos Asus strix z370-h
    CPU QTJ1 (i9-10980HK)
    Ram 2x16gb ddr4
    Rtx5060Ti 8gb…

    Damn! Always downgrade to pcie 2.0 instead pcie 3.0 like my old rtx3060ti!
    Windows 10 (last driver) and debian Linux bookworm kernel 6.12.32 (driver 575)

    Considering plus last firmware official

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *