Radeon power draw finally stays low with multi-monitor setups

In a multi-monitor setup, graphics cards naturally have higher power draw, and in some cases significantly so. But it seems that, at least with the RX 7900 XT (Sapphire Pulse), this is no longer the case. We know from measurements that the increase in power draw of this card is very low, several times lower than it used to be in the past in all the older models we have tested. Basically, we can say that the “problem is solved”.

What’s this about? With the addition of a second (or a third) monitor, the demands on the graphics card also increase, which is reflected in the increase in its power draw. This is sometimes quite small, other times the difference can be over 30W, which in idle mode is more than three times the power draw of the graphics card than when operating with a single monitor. This happens because from a certain resolution (and refresh rate) upwards, the memory bandwidth increases, along with which a more aggressive power supply is needed. However, if you are using two FullHD@60Hz monitors, i.e. with a relatively low-power panel, the impact of the second monitor on power draw will be negligible at first. However, a secondary monitor with QHD@60 Hz or higher (or even the same, but with a faster image refresh rate) often already means a significant power increase.

The fact that a second monitor can significantly increase the power draw of a graphics card is a fairly well-known thing that worries many users. Especially those who own Radeons. GeForce graphics cards also experience an increase in power draw, but it’s never an integer multiple, and the increases are only in the order of tens of percent.

However, the idle power draw of such a Radeon RX 6900 XT is vastly different with respect to whether one or two monitors are connected. We measured 13.70W with one monitor and up to 46.74W with two. It should be added here, though, that these are already quite old measurements and with the current drivers it may be different. But AMD certainly hasn’t reliably reduced these high power draw increases by mid-2021, as disclosed in this report on Adrenalin 21.6 drivers, for example. AMD didn’t officially say anything about improvements in this regard at the time, but one of the users noticed that the software diagnostics reported low power draw of the graphics card even after a second monitor was connected.

However, based on later tests (RX 6600 and RX 6650 XT), we couldn’t confirm this behaviour – the difference in power draw (with one and two monitors) remained high. Of course, it’s different to go by the application, which may underestimate the situation, than by the hardware measurements directly of the graphics card (on the power cables and on the PCIe slot, as we do by default).

However, it is also possible that the improvement may have been seen only on some cards. That’s why even now, when we measured only a nice 14.5% (from 16.01 to 18.33 W) for the Sapphire RX 7900 XT Pulse with Adrenalin 23.4.1 drivers at idle, we can’t claim that a similar ratio will be true for older models as well. It may, it may not. We can’t verify this at the moment, as we don’t have Radeon RX 6000 samples in our editorial office.

Who knows since when exactly and for which cards this model of behavior works, but in any case AMD has really worked on these shortcomings, for which it deserves praise. With respect to efficiency for 2D with two monitors, the Sapphire RX 7900 XT Pulse is already a more attractive option than the MSI RTX 4070 Ti Suprim X 12G. For the latter, power draw with a second monitor in idle mode rises by 15.1%, virtually the same as Radeon, but based on a higher baseline. The RX 7900 XT draws nearly 9W less power compared to the RTX 4070 Ti (and at 18.3W, it’s closer to the RTX 3050 Ventus 2X 8G OC). We’re still comparing Sapphire’s (Pulse) design to MSI’s (Suprim X), and for others it may differ, but we assume only symbolically so.

English translation and edit by Jozef Dudáš


English translation and edit by Jozef Dudáš


Contents

x86 ACE Instructions: AMD Zen 7 core’s AI acceleration detailed

Longtime rivals AMD and Intel have established a joint consortium seeking to make their x86 processors and their future extensions more compatible instead of using the differences and exclusive features as (anti)competitive advantages. In autumn they settled on several extensions to be made standard: AVX10/AVX-512, APX, ChkTag, FRED, and also the ACE matrix extension for AI compute, about which very little had been known until now. Read more “x86 ACE Instructions: AMD Zen 7 core’s AI acceleration detailed” »

Radeon GPU drivers for Linux will finally get HDMI 2.1 support

Valve’s incoming Steam Machine gaming PC/console drew new attention to one long‑standing weakness of the Linux ecosystem: HDMI 2.1 support. It works with Nvidia hardware (thanks to closed‑source drivers and firmware), but the open‑source drivers used for Radeon GPUs could not support it because the HDMI Forum did not allow HDMI 2.1 support in open‑source code. However, it looks like this problem may finally be coming to an end. Read more “Radeon GPU drivers for Linux will finally get HDMI 2.1 support” »

EXPO 1.2 brings support for CUDIMM memory to the AMD platform

The launch of AMD’s next‑generation desktop processors (Zen 6 architecture) is apparently still many months away. It is therefore surprising that a new feature is coming to AM5 motherboards at the current time: AMD has introduced EXPO 1.2, a new generation of DDR5 memory overclocking profiles for the AM5 platform. EXPO 1.2 adds several previously missing capabilities, especially initial support for higher‑speed CUDIMM modules. Read more “EXPO 1.2 brings support for CUDIMM memory to the AMD platform” »

Comments (2) Add comment

  1. It is November 2024 and the power draw of the RX 6900XT still has not changed with 2 monitors .

    1. Thank you for the useful information. Older generations of graphics cards will probably behave differently and on a case-by-case basis when it comes to a load combined with the display resolution and its refresh rate. Increased power consumption (with a sufficiently high bitrate) can be achieved even with a single monitor.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *