Analysis of DeepCool’s efficient 120 mm fan—the FD12

We couldn’t deprive you of the results for this model. Just ahead of the release of the second version of the DeepCool FD12, we’re publishing the results of the first so you have a comparison available—not only with the technically more modern variant, but also with competing fans. As for the FD12’s characteristics, even within its price class they are already attractive. In the end, judge for yourself based on hundreds of measurements.

Airflow per euro

Explanatory note: The following charts present airflow output in relation to unit price. This cost-performance coefficient is calculated by dividing measured airflow (in m3/h) by the fan’s price (in EUR), then multiplying the result by 1000. This is specifically to prevent the resulting values from starting with unflattering zeros.







Why is a value sometimes missing for a fan? There can be several reasons. Most commonly, it’s because the fan couldn’t be regulated to the target noise level. Some fans have higher minimum RPM (or they spin slowly but have an excessively noisy motor), or they are simply slower models that can’t reach higher decibel thresholds. Results are also omitted from graphs if the impeller scrapes against the mesh of a nylon filter. In such cases, we classify the combination as incompatible. And of course, a zero in the graphs naturally appears in situations where we record an actual 0.00. This often occurs at extremely low speeds when obstacles are present or during vibration measurements.


Contents

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *