Arctic Freezer 33 face-to-face with SilentiumPC Fera 3 v2 (bonus)

How we were testing

Cooling the processor is one thing, but cooling its power supply circuit is another. How will the coolers handle this task? We specially focused on testing the heatsinks with Noctua reference fans. Notably, the weird Freezer had some real difficulties. We know where the problem is. We made some tests without fans too, and on this occasion we decided to include top-notch passive cooler Zalman FX70.

Bonus tests of coolers are a regular extension of standard reviews. In addition to cooling efficiency around the socket, they include testing and comparison of heatsinks using the same fans as well as fully passive operation without any active cooling. And also other various tests that might be interesting for the particular cooler.

How we were testing

During the tests, we also measured CPU MOSFETs heating at 33 and 39 dBA. We put the sensor right into the heatsink. These tests always begin with the same starting temperature (35 °C). Although Gigabyte is known for an excellent cooling of its power supply and manages to maintain very attractive temperatures, it is still easy to determine which of the coolers more or less keeps doing a good job cooling the critical components.

The fans were aligned in such a way that they do not exceed over the top rib because it would be pointless there. It is more important to swirl the air in the lower parts. This was still measured with the default fans.

In the next phase of the tests, the original fans were replaced by the reference fans to create the performance comparison of the heatsinks with the same fans. These results might come in handy when you want to replace the default fans. Usually because they are too fast or too slow (and inefficient), or they produce disturbing sounds, or for whatever reason based on personal preferences.

Optimal candidates for such tests are the “industrial” Noctua NF-F12 iPPC fans. Thanks to their wide range, we could test with a very high flow and at a very low noise level. We increased the flow of the system fans (4× 1200 rpm) only in 24 V mode (2000 rpm without any problems). For a better comparison, we also included the tests with standard 4× 550 rpm. After reducing the voltage to 15 V, the fans were relatively quiet (1290 rpm) and at 9 volts they were running at 765 rpm only, which could be especially challenging for large two-tower heatsinks and larger liquid coolers.

   

Finally, the coolers competed with each other without a fan. The processor we used was Core i7-5930K (TDP 140 W) with Vcore 0.9 V, which had 25 W lower power consumption than with default settings. These tests took longer than those before, 900 seconds. Most coolers cannot handle this. After 95 ºC, tests were interrupted and considered unsuccessful. Therefore, temperatures in idle are also interesting. We used traditional configuration of system cooling and airflow. To have something to reflect to, we tested Zalman FX70 first. It is not produced anymore, but it is still one of the best coolers that Zalman has ever made, and it rarely finds a worthy opponent.

Zalman FX70: the best of the coolers designed exclusively for passive cooling
Extra test: Since Freezer 33 has significant problems in the standard (vertical) position, but horizontally works perfectly, we made a verifying test. We placed a thermal sensor above the center of the base, on the aluminum block, and watched the changes in both positions. You can find out how it ended in the last chapter.

 

  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
Flattr this!

Test of “chewing gums”: 3× Arctic and Thermal Grizzly Minus Pads

Thermal conductive pads are useful wherever a thermal paste cannot be reasonably applied. A good example are power supply circuit of graphics cards and processors, so the choice of test subjects was unambiguous. It was less clear, however, what thickness of pads is most effective, if it is better to pay for more expensive ones, and what improvement to expect. Read more “Test of “chewing gums”: 3× Arctic and Thermal Grizzly Minus Pads” »

  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Arctic Freezer 33 tasting different heat intensities

From the previous tests, you already know that Freezer 33 loses its breath quite quickly in tower cases. But it does not have to be always like that – the distinctive performance difference between the vertical and the horizontal position appears only with certain cooling efficiency requirements. At 90 W, the cooler performs differently than at 180 W. Interesting is also the comparison on the “big” Haswell-E and on the “small” Kaby Lake. Read more “Arctic Freezer 33 tasting different heat intensities” »

  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Arctic Freezer 33 face-to-face with SilentiumPC Fera 3 v2

With the i/A32 cooler series, Arctic made a really good impression and created a decent opponent for the excellent Fera 3. In the meantime, Swiss have strengthened their ranks and advanced to battle with Freezer 33. However, the expected drama with fight for every detail did not happen. Because of a design mistake of one of the players, the winner is quite dominant under standard circumstances. Read more “Arctic Freezer 33 face-to-face with SilentiumPC Fera 3 v2” »

  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *