BeQuiet! Silent Wings 4 (BL117): A white choice for your case

Cooling, Extra tests, Fans | | Ľubomír Samák

Results: Static pressure through a thinner radiator

The Silent Wings (Pro) 4 represent the pinnacle of computer fan range. The non-Pro variants stand out especially in system positions and are not well suited for radiators. This is by design and in line with the sort of “micro-segmentation” of BeQuiet. In a white design, like the one tested, it will be quite difficult to find other 140 mm fans that are quieter at comparable airflow.

Results: Static pressure through a thinner radiator

Note: “Higher is better” (the result of static pressure in the charts) is only valid for comparing fans of the same formats. We have discussed what the quantity “static pressure” means and how to understand it in this article.






Why is there a missing value sometimes? There may be more reasons. Usually it is because the fan could not be adjusted to the target noise level. Some have a higher minimum speed (or the speed is low, but the motor is too noisy) or it is a slower fan that will not reach the higher decibels. But the results in the graphs are also missing if the impeller is brushing against the nylon filter mesh. In that case, we evaluate this combination as incompatible. And zero in the graphs is naturally also in situations where we measure 0.00. This is a common occurrence at extremely low speeds with obstructions or within vibration measurements.


  •  
  •  
  •  
Continue:
Flattr this!

Related articles

More than 100 models tested. Overview of (M.2) SSD coolers

Cooling, Extra tests, SSD coolers | | Ľubomír Samák

It’s time for a comprehensive recap of the results from SSD cooler tests we’ve accumulated over the years. We’ve gathered quite a lot of data, with most of the coolers being models integrated into motherboards, compared to standalone designs available for purchase. The following article primarily creates a database of various SSD coolers, based on which you’ll be able to determine how each available model performs in terms of cooling efficiency. Read more “More than 100 models tested. Overview of (M.2) SSD coolers” »

  •  
  •  
  •  

BeQuiet! Riddle (3/2025). Can you guess what’s in the photo?

Giveaway, News | | Editors

In cooperation with BeQuiet!, we have prepared a cyclical activity for this year, which may be of interest to HWCooling readers. We’ll post a detail of some piece of hardware and you can guess what it is. You can compete (and eventually win something) on a regular basis, with a new challenge every month. But for now, you need to get “to the next round” through the next one, in March. Read more “BeQuiet! Riddle (3/2025). Can you guess what’s in the photo?” »

  •  
  •  
  •  

BeQuiet! Riddle (2/2025). Can you guess what’s in the photo?

Giveaway, News | | Editors

In cooperation with BeQuiet!, we have prepared a cyclical activity for this year, which may be of interest to HWCooling readers. We’ll post a detail of some piece of hardware and you can guess what it is. You can compete (and eventually win something) on a regular basis, with a new challenge every month. But for now, you need to get “to the next round” through the next one, in February. Read more “BeQuiet! Riddle (2/2025). Can you guess what’s in the photo?” »

  •  
  •  
  •  

Comments (7) Add comment

  1. Is the very low speed characteristics similar to that observed in CPS RZ120?

    This fan would have been much more competitive if it were to have closed corners by default. The corner swapping gimmick doesn’t seem to offer any actual benefit to me, as the vibrations are already low and similar results in dampening could already be achieved by using rubber mounts. They definitely could have saved some cost and/or priced the fan even more competitively by using integrated, closed corners instead of this gimmicky design.

    That said, for users willing to DIY, this should still be a great radiator fan. All you need is some tape to seal up the corners, saving you quite a bit of money.

    Reply

    2. Yes, if you encounter a lower airflow at the same noise level, a similar characteristic (as with the Silent Wings 4 BL117) is also found in the F5 R120. More fans have this. At such low speeds, the non-aerodynamic sounds must be extremely quiet to leave room to set the speed high enough for leading rankings.

      Replacing the corners of the BL117 is really useful if only just to be able to install this fan on a radiator of a liquid cooler, where the SW4 doesn’t make much sense. Although the SW4 doesn’t need to be smeared too much in this scenario. Sure, due to the significant drop in placement compared to other fans, the urge is there, but at higher speeds it even outperforms the NF-A14. Sure, for a fan with modern geometry it’s more of a failure, but…

      Using tape to seal the corners is a good DIY “trick”. 🙂

      Reply

      1. How would you compare it to the Pure Wings 3? This fan seems to constantly get outperformed by its cheaper sibling. The Pure Wings 3 does have a lower RPM limit, but there doesn’t seem to be other major disadvantages by going for the Pure Wings instead.

        Now I’m really curious how the high speed, 9-blade version of the Pure Wings 3 performs.

        Reply

        1. The 140 mm Pure Wings 3 with 7 blades often seems to be a balanced (and a hair more more efficient) solution like the Silent Wings 4 (BL117). Although we have the SW4 in the white variant, which probably tends to be a bit noisier. These small differences (in tonal peaks) do not show up on radiators, where the tested PW3 variant has a significant advantage for obvious reasons (good sealing corners). We are also curious about the 9-blade Pure Wings 3 in 140 mm format. We will probably get to it after the announced Arctic P14 triple fan test (PWM PST, PWM PST CO and Max). 🙂

          The Pure Wings 3 has a MTBF of 60 000 hours, which can be a disadvantage compared to Silent Wings 4 (with 300 000 hours). Lower robustness of critical parts in terms of durability (or change of properties over time) can also be indicated by the smaller impeller hub (of the PW3 BL108) and also at higher speeds relatively higher vibrations (again of the PW3 BL108), which could also indicate higher manufacturing tolerances. Of course, these vibrations could also be due to vibrations on the blades, but I assume they will be composed of several sources. And one of them will be related to the quality level of the impeller centering.

          Reply

          1. I guess the P14 trilogy will be consecutive releases then.

            It’s a shame that we can’t have a Silent Wings 4 that comes with sealed corners, otherwise we’d have a reliable (and strong performing) 14 cm fan in the ~20$/£ price range that would compete very favourably vs. the Noctua A14 for example. I guess that’s done to prevent cannibalising their sales of their own flagship, but I’m not sure if it’s a smart move given the tough competition…

            Reply

            1. Yes, the next test will be the P14 PWM PST CO and I will conclude the trilogy (on Monday?) with the Max model.

              Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *