Asus TUF Gaming TR120 (ARGB) Reverse: A nicer look? Yes, but…

This is a first – a fan with the leading edges of the impeller blades on the opposite side to normal ones. This is primarily done for a better view of “fans without stator struts” in cases with glass side panels. In addition, such an unconventional design also has quite clear and measurable advantages and disadvantages, also in terms of functional characteristics. Let’s take everything in turn.

Mounting and vibration measurement

Naturally, each tested fan must first be properly mounted. With all that we want to measure, and with the kind of precision that is required for relevant measurements, even the smallest details matter. The whole mounting system is quite complex and we are happy to have fine-tuned it to maximum satisfaction. Even if it meant hundreds of hours of tinkering. What’s so complicated about it? There’s more.

The fans are installed to the multi-purpose bracket. The substrate is a 2 mm thick metal plate to which the fan is attached, or the fan is attached together with an obstacle (e.g. a filter, hexagonal grille or liquid cooler radiator).

Bracket for installing the fan and vibrometer sensor

For correct and always equal pressure, the fans are always tightened with the same force with a torque screwdriver. If this were not the case, joints and clearances in the assembly could arise, in short, uneven conditions with undesirable distortion. For example, also for vibration measurement. On top of the fan mount there is also a bracket for the three-axis vibrometer sensor. The latter is magnetically attached via a steel insert, on which the sensor exerts a force of one kilogram and, thanks to the stop, is also always in the same place and in the same contact with the rest of the structure. These are the basics in terms of repeatability of measurements.

In order to capture the intensity at the highest possible resolution, the tray of the holder cannot be too heavy and at the same time it must be strong enough not to twist. This would again cause various distortions. Therefore, we used a hard (H19) aluminium (AL99.5) plate for the construction of the holder, whose weight is just enough so that free movement is not significantly restricted.

To achieve the finest possible resolution for vibration measurement, soft rubber inserts are provided in the mounting holes through which the bracket is installed to the tunnel. And just behind these inserts are silent blocks with a very low hardness of 30 Shore. These are also used so that the vibrations of the fans don’t spread to the tunnel skeleton. If this were to happen, then for fans with more intense vibrations, this secondary noise component, which is not related to the aerodynamic sound of the fan, would also be reflected in the noise measurement results.

Sensitive mounting mechanism allows high-resolution vibration measurement while preventing vibrations from traversing to the wind tunnel skeleton

This is where it is good to have ideal conditions, even though they are unattainable in practice, because fan vibrations will always be transmitted to the case skeleton to some degree. But each cabinet will react differently to them, or rather the final noise level will depend on a number of factors, starting with the materials used. Therefore, it is a good idea to filter out this extra noise component in tests and in practice take into account the measured vibration intensities. The higher these vibrations are, the higher the noise addition has to be taken into account.

The silent blocks are naturally formatted to offset the bracket a bit from the rest of the tunnel, otherwise they wouldn’t make sense. This creates a gap that is sealed across the entire surface with a soft foam seal with closed cell structure (i.e., it’s airtight).

To prevent vibrations from passing through to the wind tunnel structure, there is a small gap between the fan bracket and the leading edge of the tunnel, which is sealed by a soft foam collar

To properly center the fan impeller in relation to the other elements, the bracket includes a protruding frame that follows the inner contour of the seal. And to make matters even more complicated, the frame with the tested fan is pressed against this seal by a small force of compression springs, which in turn is set with the highest possible resolution for vibration measurement in mind and at the same time so that sufficient pressure is generated to maintain a flawless seal.

Vibration is measured with a Landtek VM-6380 vibration meter. It records the vibration speed (in mm) per second in all axes (X, Y, Z). For quick orientation, we calculate a 3D vector from the measured values and graph the “total” vibration intensity. But you can also find your results if you are only interested in a specific axis.

The most complicated part of the tunnel is behind us, and we’ll move on in the next chapter. But we will still stay at the beginning of the tunnel, we will just turn to the peripheries on the sides.


Contents

The most interesting (and craziest) Asus hardware at Computex

The Computex tradeshow this year seems to involve various anniversaries for many companies. In the case of Asus, the company is celebrating 20 years of its “premium” gaming brand, ROG. We visited the booth Asus has at the trade show as well and will show you some of the new hardware the company brought to its booth—because of this anniversary, much of it is quite extraordinary and forms a celebratory lineup called ROG Edition 20. Read more “The most interesting (and craziest) Asus hardware at Computex” »

Contents

Asus ROG Equalizer: Robust 12+4pin connectors that don’t burn?

Failures of the 12V‑2×6 power cable (formerly 12VHPWR) have become the scourge of recent GPU generations. Especially for Nvidia cards pushing this power standard, but also for a few Radeon models using these connectors. Various attempts to work around or mitigate the risks have popped up; this time, Asus is introducing the Equalizer special‑purpose cable for its power supplies, that aim to prevent connector melting in several ways. Read more “Asus ROG Equalizer: Robust 12+4pin connectors that don’t burn?” »

Contents

Asus ProArt PF120: The most efficient fan at low noise level

It wants to go head‑to‑head with the Phanteks T30-120 fan, while also having a slight edge in every respect. That’s Asus’s marketing—and now comes reality in HWCooling’s in‑depth analysis. The ProArt PF120 fans are truly something exceptional and worth paying attention to. High cooling efficiency and elegant daisy‑chaining are just the beginning. The overall design of Asus’s fans is impressive. Read more “Asus ProArt PF120: The most efficient fan at low noise level” »

Contents

Comments (7) Add comment

  1. Any plans for tests of the non-reverse variant, and also spacers (like Noctua NA-IS1)? To me they would be the logical next steps for topics raised in this test.

    1. We do not plan to test the standard variants of TR120 fans in the near future. In the long run, the basic plan remains the same – we have to compare all the fans that exist, haha. Only time will tell where we will really end up. 🙂

      We’ve had the NA-IS1 frames in our editorial office since their introduction. Of course it would be really useful to get to them and one day it will come. I still can’t make space for them – there is always something “more important”.

      1. Always looking forward to your tests, whatever they are🙂

        One additional question though, could you further elaborate what’s going on with the hexagonal grille tests for this fan? First time I’ve seen a fan that somehow has parts of the data missing in the middle (33 and 36 missing, but not 31 and 39). You say unstable tonal peaks, so is the RPM unstable at those noise levels, or is it due to something else?

        1. I think it’s happened before. But maybe it was for the quietest or loudest mode of normalised noise and then it can be attributed to another reason? Anyway, I will explain.

          It is important to realize how we bring the fans to the “same noise level”. It’s not like we set the fan somehow and it’s stable at, say, 36 dBA. It’s that we set the fan so that the average of 30 samples ends up at 36 dBA. The interval of these samples can be in the range of 35,9–36,1 dBA during the measurements, for example, but possibly also in a much wider range, for example 32–38 dBA, and now I am not exaggerating. This latter case is similar to trying to get the TR120 into the 33 and 36 dBA modes, which failed. With no PWM setting (nor after very fine tuning of the pulse strength with voltage in single digits of mV), we could not set the fan on the grille so that the average of 30 samples corresponds to 33 dBA and 36 dBA, respectively. It was always more or less, i.e. not what was required. This is a topic that certainly makes sense to look at in more detail. Especially after Noctua opened this “Beat frequency theory” topic, which is a good basis for understanding the issue by a wider than very narrow spectrum of users.

          1. Thanks for your detailed explanation. The only other time I have heard the need of averaging noise samples is from ThermalLeft. What’s the sampling rate you’re using?

            This phenomenon is definitely worth looking into some day, especially for instances like this where large deviations occur.

            1. The sampling rate of the Reed R8080 is 1s. The settings for the individual modes normalized according to a fixed noise level are based on the arithmetic mean of a 30-second recording. This must always be exactly 31.0; 33.0; 36.0; 39.0; 42.0 or 45.0 dBA after rounding.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *