Before Arctic transitions to its new, 7-blade fan design, let’s take a closer look at the one that has characterized the company for many years. And even though the 5-blade fans of the “P” series had certain shortcomings, they demonstrated just how efficient even low-cost designs can be. In the case of high-speed models, such as the tested P12 Max, they also show how far cooling performance can be pushed.
Five blades with noticeably curved leading edges. That’s the simplest way to describe the aerodynamic design of these fans. The blades themselves are quite large in area, since there are relatively few of them, and Arctic’s aim has been to achieve high static pressure. The name of this series – “P” – actually stems from this, with the letter standing for “Pressure” (static pressure).
The drop in airflow due to an obstacle placed in the fan’s path should be minimal. Or rather… it should be lower than with fans that don’t focus on this aspect. And the geometry of the P12 Max fans isn’t just suited for achieving high airflow, but also for delivering high static pressure.
Is it a bit confusing? A fan can have high airflow, but if it lacks high static pressure, many of the air streamlines won’t be able to overcome an obstacle, and the actual airflow through the barrier won’t be as high. A good example of this is the now-discontinued BioniX F120 fan (also by Arctic), which achieved high airflow, but only in environments without back pressure. In other words, only where there are no obstacles – a condition that doesn’t reflect real-world use. The P12 Max, however, is designed to handle obstructions well.
When it comes to airflow, it’s expected to be exceptionally high due to the extremely high speeds. At 12 V (100% PWM), the fan reaches up to 3300 RPM. That’s a significant speed advantage not only over many competing fans, but also compared to standard P12 models, which max out at roughly half the speed of the P12 Max.
The high speeds also bring with them greater thermal expansion of materials, particularly the blades, and to prevent excessive deformation, the rotor is reinforced with a surrounding hoop. This helps to reduce vibration and, consequently, lowers the secondary noise that the fan may produce. This typically involves transferring the vibrations to the case and the surface it rests on. With the hoop in place, such behavior should be minimized, resulting in lower vibration and less noise at critical RPM levels – where otherwise (without the ring), tonal peaks would be more pronounced. At these frequencies, the P12 Max would be noisier than the P12 models. However, in this case, higher speed doesn’t necessarily mean more noise. This is not about aerodynamic noise, but rather sound generated as a response to vibrations at specific speeds.
Interestingly, smaller vibrations can sometimes produce louder noise. This depends on the shape and material of the components – taller tonal peaks and what we commonly describe as louder noise can occur even with low vibrations, while higher vibration levels may actually result in a quieter fan. That’s because at those levels, resonance frequencies are no longer being excited – fairly straightforward. This is also why the impeller hoop, which Arctic already used on its P12 A-RGB fans, exists. These fans are made of a similarly soft material, like the PBT used in the P12 Max.
To minimize the transmission of vibrations to the case or to the cooler (and subsequently to the case via the motherboard…), the P12 Max fan has anti-vibration pads in its corners. These pads are softer than the fan frame but can still be considered relatively firm. They certainly serve their purpose and are by no means redundant. The anti-vibration pads are also one of the structural features that distinguish the P12 Max from the standard P12 models, which do not have these pads.














Overall quite similar behaviour (at same noise levels) vs the ARGB variant. Not too much compromise at lower speeds unlike the P14 Max, which is good to see.
One thing I just noticed is the different stator ribs compared to other fans in the Arctic P family. Now they’re thicker and straight (like many other fans) rather than thin and curved. This perhaps sacrifices a tiny amount of airflow but is needed for supporting the higher RPM and rotor weight.
Good point. The P12 Max fan is about 20 grams heavier than the P12 A-RGB. And it doesn’t even have any LEDs, which also add some weight. While we don’t know the exact difference in material density – since the P12 Max uses PBT for its rotor and the P12 A-RGB likely uses polycarbonate – there’s definitely some variation happening at that level too. 🙂
it seems the spam filter worked better with the older version… the Indonesian university bot seems pretty persistent (that’s the 3rd time I’ve noticed it) 😉
… I’m attaching the response to this thread so you don’t have a problem deleting it
so now, I’m really curious if there will be any answer 😀
…now you chose a different approach instead of deleting… we’ll see 😉
Are there more information regarding about this topic for us to research for? Thank you, Regard Telkom University
Is there any other information you’re interested in? Let us know, and we’ll do our best to provide whatever is within our capabilities. 🙂