Arctic P12 Max: Five blades pushed to the limit

Before Arctic transitions to its new, 7-blade fan design, let’s take a closer look at the one that has characterized the company for many years. And even though the 5-blade fans of the “P” series had certain shortcomings, they demonstrated just how efficient even low-cost designs can be. In the case of high-speed models, such as the tested P12 Max, they also show how far cooling performance can be pushed.

Base 6 equal noise levels…

There are several options by which to normalize the test modes for fans. In the previous chapter, we wrote that perhaps the least appropriate option is equal speed.

Settings according to the same static pressure or flow are for consideration, but we find it most sensible in the long term to normalize the measurement modes according to the same noise levels. Firstly because decibels are a logarithmic unit and all others scale linearly, but mainly because you can orientate fastest by the same noise levels. The easiest way to compare the efficiency of fans is just by how they perform at the same sound pressure level. Of all the options, this is the one that most people can best imagine and bounce off of when considering other variables.

The individual noise level modes are adjusted from low levels continuously to higher levels. All users will find their results in the tests, regardless of whether they prefer very quiet operation at the limit of audibility or whether high performance is paramount.

The quietest mode corresponds to 31 dBA, followed by 33 dBA, and for each additional mode we add 3 dBA, which always doubles the noise level (36, 39, 42 and 45 dBA). Finally, we measure the fans at maximum power. Here, each one already has a slightly different noise level, which we also report. If there are missing measurements between the results for any of the fans, this means that it was not possible to set the target noise level. Either because its minimum speed exceeds the quietest mode of 31 dBA or vice versa because the fan is quieter than 45 dBA at maximum power.

It is important to add that our noise level measurements are incomparable to the values quoted by the fan manufacturers in their specifications. One of the reasons is because we use a parabola-shaped collar around the sensor of the noise meter, which increases sensitivity. This is important in order to distinguish and set to the same noise level even modes at very low speeds, especially 31 dBA.

The noise meter next to the fan is quite close for sufficient resolution. The distance between the frame and the sensor is 15 centimeters. The sensor is positioned in such a way that there is no distortion or that the noise level measurements are not affected by airflow. Therefore, the noise meter is centered perpendicularly to the frame that defines the depth of the fan. Everything is always at the same angle and at the same distance. We use an inclinometer and markers to set the distances precisely and always the same.

The noise meter sensor is positioned relative to the position of the fan from the profile. It is centered to the depth of the frame both vertically and horizontally

We use a Reed R8080 noise meter to measure noise levels. This allows real-time averaging of samples, which is important for fine-tuning individual modes. We tune the fans until the specified noise level is reached to two decimal places, for example 31.50 dBA. The noise meter is the only instrument we calibrate inside our testlab. The other instruments have been calibrated by the relevant technical institutes. However, in the case of the noise meter, calibration is required before each test and we therefore have our own calibrator. This is already calibrated externally according to the standard.


Contents

Primarily quieter operation: Arctic P12 Pro (A-RGB) LN fans

Arctic has expanded its fan portfolio with new P12 Pro (A-RGB) models carrying the “LN” suffix in their designation. This stands for “low-noise” and in practice mainly means that maximum speeds are capped lower than on the original (P12 Pro/A-RGB) fans. However, the aerodynamic design itself remains unchanged, with the primary difference being the motor. At the same time, these are still affordable fans. Read more “Primarily quieter operation: Arctic P12 Pro (A-RGB) LN fans” »

Contents

The end, or just the beginning? 100 fans in HWCooling tests

Our database now includes one hundred fans—75 in the 120 mm format and 25 models with a physical size of 140 mm. In this article, we have compiled all data into unified charts. What was once separated for clarity is now brought together again, and the commentary will also include a… look ahead regarding fan testing. But we can already reveal that there is still a lot more to come. Read more “The end, or just the beginning? 100 fans in HWCooling tests” »

Contents

Arctic P12 Pro Reverse A-RGB: Looking good, working well!

The impeller is oriented so that, in the installed position, nothing visually obstructs the view. This refers to the stator struts, which can otherwise “spoil” the appearance. But this is not just about looks—it is about combining them with the efficient geometry of the proven five-blade design with a stabilizing ring (familiar from the P12 A-RGB). It is not exactly the same design, though, if only because what used to be behind the impeller is now in front of it. Read more “Arctic P12 Pro Reverse A-RGB: Looking good, working well!” »

Contents

Comments (6) Add comment

  1. Overall quite similar behaviour (at same noise levels) vs the ARGB variant. Not too much compromise at lower speeds unlike the P14 Max, which is good to see.

    One thing I just noticed is the different stator ribs compared to other fans in the Arctic P family. Now they’re thicker and straight (like many other fans) rather than thin and curved. This perhaps sacrifices a tiny amount of airflow but is needed for supporting the higher RPM and rotor weight.

    1. Good point. The P12 Max fan is about 20 grams heavier than the P12 A-RGB. And it doesn’t even have any LEDs, which also add some weight. While we don’t know the exact difference in material density – since the P12 Max uses PBT for its rotor and the P12 A-RGB likely uses polycarbonate – there’s definitely some variation happening at that level too. 🙂

      1. it seems the spam filter worked better with the older version… the Indonesian university bot seems pretty persistent (that’s the 3rd time I’ve noticed it) 😉
        … I’m attaching the response to this thread so you don’t have a problem deleting it

        1. so now, I’m really curious if there will be any answer 😀
          …now you chose a different approach instead of deleting… we’ll see 😉

    1. Is there any other information you’re interested in? Let us know, and we’ll do our best to provide whatever is within our capabilities. 🙂

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *