The impeller is oriented so that, in the installed position, nothing visually obstructs the view. This refers to the stator struts, which can otherwise “spoil” the appearance. But this is not just about looks—it is about combining them with the efficient geometry of the proven five-blade design with a stabilizing ring (familiar from the P12 A-RGB). It is not exactly the same design, though, if only because what used to be behind the impeller is now in front of it.
Measuring the intensity (and power consumption) of lighting
Modern fans often include lighting. This is no longer a “cooling” parameter, but for some users the presence of (A)RGB LEDs is important. Therefore, we also measure how intense this lighting is in our tests. These tests are the only ones that take place externally, outside the wind tunnel.
We record the luminosity of the fans in a chamber with reflective walls. This internal arrangement is important to increase the resolution for us to measure anything at all with lower luminosity fans. But also so that the readings do not blend together and it is obvious which fan is emitting more light and which one less.
The illumination intensity is measured in the horizontal position of the fan, above which is the lux meter sensor (UNI-T UT383S). This is centered on the illumination intensity sensing chamber.
The illumination is controlled via an IR controller and the hue is set to RGB level 255, 255, 255 (white). We record the brightness at maximum and minimum intensity. According to this, you can easily see if the brightness is high enough, but conversely also if the lower level is low enough for you.
In addition to the brightness intensity, we also measure the power consumption that it requires. This is again through the shunt, which is between the Gophert CPS-3205 power supply and the (A)RGB LED driver. After this we get a reading of the lighting power consumption. In the graphs we show it separately, but also in sum with the motor power consumption as the total maximum fan power.
Hmm, the 100th fan in the database—counting 140 mm models as well. On Thursday, we’ll do a kind of recap or summary, where all fans tested so far will appear together in the charts. 🙂
After reading the methodology section I’m still uncertain about when the tests were performed with the obstacles infront or behind the fan. Could you please clarify that?
Scenario by scenario, it varies. The radiators (both thinner and thicker ones) are behind the fans, as they are more commonly used in practice, while the dust filters (both nylon and plastic) are in front of them, i.e. in front of the impeller. That also makes more sense.
There is also a hexagonal grille in front of the fan, on the intake side, although in PC cases (for example, on the exhaust) it is often located behind it. We chose this placement because having it behind the impeller doesn’t change the acoustic profile very much, whereas with the opposite orientation, the difference can sometimes be quite significant, especially when it comes to tonal peaks. 🙂
Thanks for the clarification!
Your setup is what I was hoping for, for the reasons you already stated yourself. And just to make sure I’m not misunderstanding a fine detail: Whether **reverse blade fan or regular fan**, your dust filter test setup (both nylon an plastic) will always reflect typical real world usage, i.e. air will be “pulled” through the filter instead of being “pushed” through it. Right? Thanks in advance!
Yes, the dust filters are always on the intake side of the fans. 🙂
For the most accurate comparison possible, reverse fans are also positioned in the same relationship to the anemometer (in pull). That’s a more complicated discussion, but this is always the case regardless of the fan. If we did it the opposite way, in push, the area where we measure the wind/air speed—which is subsequently used to calculate the airflow in cubic units—would be too turbulent, and the results would therefore be distorted. 🙂