So, we have results for a Thermalright fan. While the first attempt (or second, if we count the now-discontinued model X-Silent 120) didn’t quite hit the mark, it’s probably fair to say that this is a more attractive option than the Scythe Kaze Flex II 120. Yes, these two fans are being directly compared because they share an unusual trait – they spin in the “reverse” direction, from left to right. And as you know, most fans spin the other way…
Let’s first look at why it even matters which direction a fan spins. We’re talking about how air is broken up during movement, assuming the airflow direction remains the same. In an isolated environment, this shouldn’t matter theoretically – what determines performance is aerodynamic design (the shape of the individual blades, the relationship between blade shape and the frame, and so on). But there’s still a valid reason to examine this issue – especially in the context of heatsinks or radiators with at least two fans operating in series.
That means one fan (pushing air through the heatsink fins) feeds its streamlines into the second. In such a configuration, streamline separation behind the heatsink is reduced, which minimizes the negative impact of centrifugal forces and helps maintain higher pressure between the fins – improving cooling performance. This is the theory Scythe introduced with its Fuma series of coolers, though Thermalright seems to approach things differently. In fact, Thermalright’s multi-fan coolers tend to use all either clockwise-rotating or counter-clockwise-rotating fans.
If we haven’t missed anything, Thermalright doesn’t seem to prefer mixing impeller spin directions in its CPU coolers. Apart from Scythe (and its Fuma 3, for example), graphics card manufacturers also use such mixed setups – in triple-fan designs, the center fan often spins in the opposite direction, which naturally makes the most sense. In any case, this is mostly cosmetic, and whether higher cooling performance is achieved at comparable noise levels depends on many factors. You’ll likely remember that the Fuma 3 cooler wasn’t particularly outstanding in terms of cooling efficiency. The use of counter-rotating fans may have a positive effect, but clearly it’s not enough to outperform competing solutions.
And now to the Thermalright TL-C12C fan. The impeller spins clockwise, and the blade geometry is adapted accordingly. The leading edges of the blades are on the right side, unlike the majority of fans (which have the traditional counter-clockwise rotation). Regarding the aerodynamic design, there is an evident effort to keep the blades short enough to reduce flex while minimizing the gaps between them, which helps maintain good static pressure.
The number of blades is average – there are nine. Their angle is relatively shallow, similar to that of the Kaze Flex II 120, but the individual blades on the Thermalright fan are more robust and wider, which makes sense given the lower blade count (9 vs. 11). Still, we’re entering testing with the assumption that this fan design is aimed primarily at achieving high airflow (with weaker static pressure). This is supported by the specifications listed by the manufacturer for the TL-C12C.
It’s also important to understand that the Thermalright TL-C12C is a budget-friendly option. Three-packs are commonly available for around €15, and individual units go for under seven euros. That’s comparable to (and sometimes cheaper than) the price of Arctic P12 fans. So, we’re not looking at uncompromising high-end fans, but rather an affordable, low-cost solution that remains accessible even if you need several units.
The maximum speed of the 120 mm TL-C12C fans is around 1550 RPM, placing them in the “quiet” or more accurately “moderately quiet” (or moderately loud? – take your pick…) category.
The fan cable has two connectors. One is for connecting to the motherboard (or a fan hub), and the other is for daisy-chaining another fan. The benefit of this design lies in cleaner cable management, where multiple fans can be connected in series and only one cable leads to the fan header that powers and controls them. Unlike other fans, the TL-C12C comes with a relatively long cable (46–53 cm), which can be either an advantage or a disadvantage depending on your setup (e.g., if long cables get in the way). In any case, this is likely because no extension adapter is included, and Thermalright seems to have wanted to ensure the cable is long enough for any situation.
Please note: The article continues in the following chapters.














A potentially huge problem for this fan is its longevity. I’ve seen quite a number of reports of them failing in large numbers only after a few months of usage, presumably due to bearing failure. Have you seen any signs of this happening on your units?
Even when ignoring this issue, I don’t see it being particularly competitive vs fans like Endorfy Stratus and Arctic P12. While airflow per price vs no obstacles is high, but the value decreases greatly if you look at airflow per price vs radiators, for example.
Even though I cannot assess longevity, I can assess the ratio of airflow to price. And especially when it comes to the ratio airflow to price on radiators, this ratio speaks in favor of the TL-C12C compared to the Stratus. The P12 is from another world, nothing can be compared to it 😀 . Moreover, I counted with the price that Ľubo states in the specification (in €). If we took the price of a three-pack even the P12 would sweat.
Every dBA lvl – https://imgur.com/bhNPXyJ
Average – https://imgur.com/G8EmutF
I would say that overall the TL-C12C is quite comparable to the Stratus (except for the lifespan, which I can’t assess). 😉
Here are the current best prices from geizhals.de (19-6-2025, 9:30 am)
https://imgur.com/ppoJbo2
Yes, the price of the TL-C12C in the triple pack is extremely attractive. However, I assume that a fan hub will not be included in the standard accessories, as is sometimes the case with more expensive models. Here it will probably rely on the possibility of daisy-chaining and connecting all three fans to one header on the motherboard or case (if the case has its own hub). 🙂
You’re right, I was not aware of the fact that the triple pack is priced so low. If C12C works well long term, I can see them being quite attractive.
Good point. Unfortunately, we cannot assess lifespan. I’ve played around with the idea of creating some form of methodology based on “accelerated aging”, but under our conditions, that would not be easy… Recently, my colleague and I talked about fluid dynamic bearings and yes, the quality level can vary. This is also reflected in the wide range of MTBF/MTTF values… so yes, in the case of the TL-C12C, it’s probably a bit weaker here, but that probably also applies to the Stratus 120 PWM fans. Those are also low-end, but aerodynamically excellent, and I think both deserve the Smart Buy! award (the fans). Arctic P12, as Bufo points out, is “from another world”, but we should keep in mind that this might not be the case for much longer. It depends on how long Arctic continues to sell and supply them to third-party retailers. 🙂
According to this source, the “S-FDB” aka “Stably-Fluid Dynamic Bearing” is just a rifle bearing with a 20k hr MTTF… That could explain the poor longevity.
https://en.namu.wiki/w/Thermalright/%EC%BF%A8%EB%A7%81%ED%8C%AC
Thanks for the clarification. You’re right — not all FDBs are created equal. That’s also why the range of MTBF values (with FDB) is so wide. 🙂
as one fictional character said 😉
Bearing is bearing.
Rifle, Fluid, Hydro …
Makes no difference.
The degree is arbitrary.
The definition’s blurred.
or something like that … 😀
(message for Ľubo…you don’t have to resolve the differences…this is just for relief) 😀
Just want to say THANK YOU! This info doesn’t show up anywhere nor prominently in search engine results when researching lifetime of these Thermalright fans. Now it also makes sense why the E12B V3 model stops after 4 seconds on max RPM when the power is cut. With an Arctic P14 I saw it’s over 12 seconds. Makes sense now. Feeling pretty disappointed how misleading Thermalright is with the “FDB” claim…