So, we have results for a Thermalright fan. While the first attempt (or second, if we count the now-discontinued model X-Silent 120) didn’t quite hit the mark, it’s probably fair to say that this is a more attractive option than the Scythe Kaze Flex II 120. Yes, these two fans are being directly compared because they share an unusual trait – they spin in the “reverse” direction, from left to right. And as you know, most fans spin the other way…
Measuring the intensity (and power consumption) of lighting
Modern fans often include lighting. This is no longer a “cooling” parameter, but for some users the presence of (A)RGB LEDs is important. Therefore, we also measure how intense this lighting is in our tests. These tests are the only ones that take place externally, outside the wind tunnel.
We record the luminosity of the fans in a chamber with reflective walls. This internal arrangement is important to increase the resolution for us to measure anything at all with lower luminosity fans. But also so that the readings do not blend together and it is obvious which fan is emitting more light and which one less.
The illumination intensity is measured in the horizontal position of the fan, above which is the lux meter sensor (UNI-T UT383S). This is centered on the illumination intensity sensing chamber.
The illumination is controlled via an IR controller and the hue is set to RGB level 255, 255, 255 (white). We record the brightness at maximum and minimum intensity. According to this, you can easily see if the brightness is high enough, but conversely also if the lower level is low enough for you.
In addition to the brightness intensity, we also measure the power consumption that it requires. This is again through the shunt, which is between the Gophert CPS-3205 power supply and the (A)RGB LED driver. After this we get a reading of the lighting power consumption. In the graphs we show it separately, but also in sum with the motor power consumption as the total maximum fan power.
A potentially huge problem for this fan is its longevity. I’ve seen quite a number of reports of them failing in large numbers only after a few months of usage, presumably due to bearing failure. Have you seen any signs of this happening on your units?
Even when ignoring this issue, I don’t see it being particularly competitive vs fans like Endorfy Stratus and Arctic P12. While airflow per price vs no obstacles is high, but the value decreases greatly if you look at airflow per price vs radiators, for example.
Even though I cannot assess longevity, I can assess the ratio of airflow to price. And especially when it comes to the ratio airflow to price on radiators, this ratio speaks in favor of the TL-C12C compared to the Stratus. The P12 is from another world, nothing can be compared to it 😀 . Moreover, I counted with the price that Ľubo states in the specification (in €). If we took the price of a three-pack even the P12 would sweat.
Every dBA lvl – https://imgur.com/bhNPXyJ
Average – https://imgur.com/G8EmutF
I would say that overall the TL-C12C is quite comparable to the Stratus (except for the lifespan, which I can’t assess). 😉
Here are the current best prices from geizhals.de (19-6-2025, 9:30 am)
https://imgur.com/ppoJbo2
Yes, the price of the TL-C12C in the triple pack is extremely attractive. However, I assume that a fan hub will not be included in the standard accessories, as is sometimes the case with more expensive models. Here it will probably rely on the possibility of daisy-chaining and connecting all three fans to one header on the motherboard or case (if the case has its own hub). 🙂
You’re right, I was not aware of the fact that the triple pack is priced so low. If C12C works well long term, I can see them being quite attractive.
Good point. Unfortunately, we cannot assess lifespan. I’ve played around with the idea of creating some form of methodology based on “accelerated aging”, but under our conditions, that would not be easy… Recently, my colleague and I talked about fluid dynamic bearings and yes, the quality level can vary. This is also reflected in the wide range of MTBF/MTTF values… so yes, in the case of the TL-C12C, it’s probably a bit weaker here, but that probably also applies to the Stratus 120 PWM fans. Those are also low-end, but aerodynamically excellent, and I think both deserve the Smart Buy! award (the fans). Arctic P12, as Bufo points out, is “from another world”, but we should keep in mind that this might not be the case for much longer. It depends on how long Arctic continues to sell and supply them to third-party retailers. 🙂
According to this source, the “S-FDB” aka “Stably-Fluid Dynamic Bearing” is just a rifle bearing with a 20k hr MTTF… That could explain the poor longevity.
https://en.namu.wiki/w/Thermalright/%EC%BF%A8%EB%A7%81%ED%8C%AC
Thanks for the clarification. You’re right — not all FDBs are created equal. That’s also why the range of MTBF values (with FDB) is so wide. 🙂
as one fictional character said 😉
Bearing is bearing.
Rifle, Fluid, Hydro …
Makes no difference.
The degree is arbitrary.
The definition’s blurred.
or something like that … 😀
(message for Ľubo…you don’t have to resolve the differences…this is just for relief) 😀
Just want to say THANK YOU! This info doesn’t show up anywhere nor prominently in search engine results when researching lifetime of these Thermalright fans. Now it also makes sense why the E12B V3 model stops after 4 seconds on max RPM when the power is cut. With an Arctic P14 I saw it’s over 12 seconds. Makes sense now. Feeling pretty disappointed how misleading Thermalright is with the “FDB” claim…