Low-profile fans are a special category, but sometimes they are unavoidable in more confined spaces. For technical reasons, it’s always about compromises compared to more respectable fans of normal thickness, but their weight can vary. If the Arctic P12 Slim and Alphacool SL-15 don’t fit your needs, the Scythe Kaze Flex II 120 Slim may be the closest thing to what you’re looking for.
Base 6 equal noise levels…
There are several options by which to normalize the test modes for fans. In the previous chapter, we wrote that perhaps the least appropriate option is equal speed.
Settings according to the same static pressure or flow are for consideration, but we find it most sensible in the long term to normalize the measurement modes according to the same noise levels. Firstly because decibels are a logarithmic unit and all others scale linearly, but mainly because you can orientate fastest by the same noise levels. The easiest way to compare the efficiency of fans is just by how they perform at the same sound pressure level. Of all the options, this is the one that most people can best imagine and bounce off of when considering other variables.
The individual noise level modes are adjusted from low levels continuously to higher levels. All users will find their results in the tests, regardless of whether they prefer very quiet operation at the limit of audibility or whether high performance is paramount.
The quietest mode corresponds to 31 dBA, followed by 33 dBA, and for each additional mode we add 3 dBA, which always doubles the noise level (36, 39, 42 and 45 dBA). Finally, we measure the fans at maximum power. Here, each one already has a slightly different noise level, which we also report. If there are missing measurements between the results for any of the fans, this means that it was not possible to set the target noise level. Either because its minimum speed exceeds the quietest mode of 31 dBA or vice versa because the fan is quieter than 45 dBA at maximum power.
It is important to add that our noise level measurements are incomparable to the values quoted by the fan manufacturers in their specifications. One of the reasons is because we use a parabola-shaped collar around the sensor of the noise meter, which increases sensitivity. This is important in order to distinguish and set to the same noise level even modes at very low speeds, especially 31 dBA.
The noise meter next to the fan is quite close for sufficient resolution. The distance between the frame and the sensor is 15 centimeters. The sensor is positioned in such a way that there is no distortion or that the noise level measurements are not affected by airflow. Therefore, the noise meter is centered perpendicularly to the frame that defines the depth of the fan. Everything is always at the same angle and at the same distance. We use an inclinometer and markers to set the distances precisely and always the same.
We use a Reed R8080 noise meter to measure noise levels. This allows real-time averaging of samples, which is important for fine-tuning individual modes. We tune the fans until the specified noise level is reached to two decimal places, for example 31.50 dBA. The noise meter is the only instrument we calibrate inside our testlab. The other instruments have been calibrated by the relevant technical institutes. However, in the case of the noise meter, calibration is required before each test and we therefore have our own calibrator. This is already calibrated externally according to the standard.
On the evaluation page, the link to frequency analysis on plastic filters was wrong (39 instead of 29). Also, the summary was wrongly replaced by the spec table.
On your evaluation of frequency, you say thay the weakness of the fan only shows when it runs above 1100 RPM (that is 45 dBA). But from reading the charts, there seems to be strong peaks that appear in 39 dBA mode (959 RPM) as well. Did I interpret the data incorrectly?
Thank you for the heads up. Corrected. Including the charts that were really messed up. I was already in advanced stages of exhaustion when I released it yesterday…
… you read the spectrographs well. Yes, you are right, even the 39 dBA (~959 rpm) mode is characterized by more pronounced tonal peaks, so I’ve modified that statement a bit. Below 850 rpm it’s fine in that respect. Approximately such speeds at 39 dBA correspond to tests with a plastic filter and on a grille, which increase the noise level, so when tuned to the same level the fan speeds will always be a bit slower than in a use case without an obstacle.
So thanks for this observation and apologies for the inaccurate interpretation of the results. I wrote the article a bit under pressure and at the same time on the verge of complete exhaustion. I hope that similar mistakes will be avoided in the future.
You don’t have to apologize, it does not take away from the fact that the overall analysis is great work.
Health is very important. I hope you’ll find time to take a good rest and don’t push yourself too hard 🙂. Take care.
Guys, please test 120 and 140x25mm Kaze Flex – they were highly praised by other (but not as advanced as you) reviewiers, especially as case fans. I generally really like them from my own experience for being solid performers; sounding well; having quiet motor and bearing and representing nice quality additionally proven by few years of using them in my own pc.
Sure, the 120 and 140 mm Kaze Flex II will be next in line as far as Scythe fans are concerned. I mean, maybe the Grand Tornado model, which is close to release, will fit in between them.